Percepción sobre la calidad de los cuidados, entorno laboral y características del sueño de las enfermeras que trabajan en el Sistema Nacional de Salud

Nurses' protocol‐based care decision‐making: a multiple case study

“…Three contextual aspects especially relevant to the process of PBC decision-making were identified: the organisational climate, coaching and the type of protocol. The finding that suggests that the organisational climate shapes the predisposition of nurses to focus their decision-making from the perspective of PBC is in line with previous studies that reveal the influence of the organisational climate on the way nurses work (Aiken et al, 2013;Moreno-Casbas et al, 2018).…”

“…Three contextual aspects especially relevant to the process of PBC decision‐making were identified: the organisational climate, coaching and the type of protocol. The finding that suggests that the organisational climate shapes the predisposition of nurses to focus their decision‐making from the perspective of PBC is in line with previous studies that reveal the influence of the organisational climate on the way nurses work (Aiken et al, 2013; Moreno‐Casbas et al, 2018). The influence of particular aspects of the organisational climate, such as the attitude towards protocols and inter‐ and intra‐professional relationships in the predisposition of professionals to balance the standardisation and individualisation of care, also echoes previous findings (Johansson et al, 2009; Manias & Street, 2000; Parker & Lawton, 2000).…”

Undergraduate nurses' perception of the nursing practice environment in university hospitals: A cross‐sectional survey

“…They also observed positive nursephysician relationships as the most favourable factor in the nursing practice environment of the university hospitals where their clinical placements were carried out. While these findings have been found to be different in some studies (Moreno-Casbas et al, 2018;Nelson-Brantley et al, 2018), on the other hand, other researchers have also found the same results as the current study (Numminen et al, 2016), showing staffing and resource adequacy as the most unfavourable factor and nurse-physician relationships as the most favourable and the only positive factor scored over 2.5 (Brofidi et al, 2018). This may suggest that, over the years and the research carried out, some aspects of the clinical environment such as working relationships have progressed.…”

“…Regarding the results of the factors measured with PES‐NWI instrument, ‘Staffing and resources adequacy’ was the factor that obtained the lowest score in the majority of studies (Al‐Maaitah et al., 2018; Fuentelsaz‐Gallego et al., 2013; Park et al., 2018). However, the highest‐scoring factor differed from one study to the next, with some studies finding that the highest‐scoring factor was ‘Nurse‐physician relationships’ (Numminen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2014) and other studies in which the factors of ‘Nursing foundations for quality care’ (Moreno‐Casbas et al., 2018; Nelson‐Brantley et al., 2018) and ‘Nursing manager ability, leadership and support of nurses’ (Fuentelsaz‐Gallego et al., 2012) scored most highly. Concerning hospital classification, previous studies have shown results in which the nursing practice environment in hospitals was mainly classified as unfavourable (Fuentelsaz‐Gallego, et al., 2013; Sillero & Zabalegui, 2018), while also observing mixed or favourable results in some centres (Desmedt et al., 2012; Gómez‐García et al., 2016).…”

“…The original version of the PES‐NWI was developed and validated in English by Lake (2002), based on the Nursing Work Index (NWI) and the Nursing Work Index‐Revised (NWI‐R) instruments. Currently, the questionnaire is translated and validated into French (McCusker et al, 2004), Chinese (Chiang & Lin, 2008), Greek (Zikos et al., 2012), Spanish (Fuentelsaz‐Gallego et al., 2013), Portuguese (Ferreira & Martins, 2014) and Japanese (Ogata et al., 2018), enabling its application on an international level in countries such as Australia (Walker et al, 2010), Germany, Belgium (Chen & Johantgen, 2010), China (Chen & Fang, 2016; Wang et al., 2015), Japan (Tei‐Tominaga & Sato, 2016; Tei‐Tominaga et al., 2012), Switzerland (Desmedt et al., 2012), Thailand (Nantsupawat et al., 2017), Jordan (Al‐Hamdan et al., 2017), Greece (Brofidi et al., 2018), Spain (Moreno‐Casbas et al., 2018; Sillero & Zabalegui, 2018) and the United States (Nelson‐Brantley et al., 2018; Park et al., 2018).…”