2019
DOI: 10.21083/partnership.v14i2.5169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and Experiences of Precarious Employment in Canadian Libraries: An Exploratory Study

Abstract: Precarious employment is a labour practice characterized for employers by flexibility and economic efficiencies and for workers by vulnerability and uncertainty as to job duration, scheduling, and pay. It is increasingly common in Canada and can result in physical, mental, financial, and social strain for people who experience it. In libraries, it has the potential for negative effects on individual staff members, organizational health, and service quality. However, literature on precarious library work is sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in library school, I learned that the contracts I would take in my first years after graduation would be precarious roles marked by a lack of stability, a lack of financial security, and a great deal of professional uncertainty (Henninger, Brons, Riley, & Yin, 2019;Lacey, 2019). But what would I do if there were no jobs at all?…”
Section: Perspectives On Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in library school, I learned that the contracts I would take in my first years after graduation would be precarious roles marked by a lack of stability, a lack of financial security, and a great deal of professional uncertainty (Henninger, Brons, Riley, & Yin, 2019;Lacey, 2019). But what would I do if there were no jobs at all?…”
Section: Perspectives On Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pre-pandemic world, workers in precarious roles were already living in "a state of material and psychological vulnerability" marked by uncertain employment duration and "a lack of access to the social protections and benefits" available to full-time employees (Henninger, Brons, Riley, & Yin, 2019, p. 2). In Canadian libraries, employees in contract and auxiliary roles have described the negative outcomes of these employment practices, including a lack of work-life balance, increased isolation, a lack of integration with their organization, and growing pressure to neglect personal health in exchange for more work and the chance for continued employment (Henninger, Brons, Riley, & Yin, 2019). During the last three recessions (1981-1982, 1990-1992, and 2008-2009), "young workers, less educated workers, and recently hired workers were more likely to be laid off-temporarily or permanently-than other employees", and this is still the case in our new pandemic era (Chan, Morissette, & Qiu, 2020, p. 1).…”
Section: Remote Work and Enhanced Job Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can include workers in part-time or full-time positions, temporary or permanent positions, and on-call or auxiliary positions. Although authors in recent years have begun to address the effects of precarious library work (Henninger, Brons, Riley, & Yin, 2019;Lacey, 2019;Skyrme & Levesque, 2019), there is still very little scholarship documenting the prevalence of precarious work or describing the characteristics of precarious jobs. Accordingly, this article focuses on examining the prevalence of precarious library jobs and the factors associated with them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted, many participants did not negotiate because they felt that they were lucky just to receive an offer. A recent study was conducted regarding the increasing presence of the "gig economy" in librarianship and the negative effects of precarious work in Canadian libraries (Henninger et al, 2019). The increased number of short-term positions over the course of one's career potentially means new librarians will negotiate more than their predecessors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%