Enhancing employee performance and improving staff retention are key objectives within the visitor economy, especially among the subset of tourism and hospitality businesses where there is a strong emphasis on 'people first' practices. A significant threat to achieving these sector goals is the presence of psychosocial risk factors associated with abuse and ill-treatment at work. This study examines the role of workplace bullying in the relationship between two organisational approaches to support workforce performance, high performance work systems and perceived organisational support, and employee engagement and retention. Our findings indicate that bullying weakens or even reverses the impact of these organisational initiatives, with HPWS found to increase perceived exposure to bullying. The paper discusses the implications for the visitor economy, particularly, the need to enhance the perception of concern for employee wellbeing and create healthy work environments in the sector if organisational efforts to enhance engagement and retention are to be effective. 2 Literature Review 2.1 Theoretical perspectives on HRM: HPWS and POS to enhance worker satisfaction and reduce leave intentions Numerous studies have highlighted the effectiveness of human resource management (HRM) practices in achieving satisfaction and retention that are salient for the visitor economy (e.g. Delery 1998; Huselid 1995; Way 2002), although there are a wide range of issues which impact upon human resource (HR) practices and performance and productivity that remain germane areas for research (Guest 2011). One approach to people management, based on strategic HRM and the resource-based view, relates to the macro system of practices organisations use to manage human capital (Murphy, DiPietro and Murrmann 2007). These macro systems of practices are known as high performance work systems (HPWS). HPWS include a range of HRM practices that have been associated with positive organisational performance (Huselid 1995; Ramsay, Scholarios, and Harley 2000). Despite the growing literature on HPWS, there has not been any uniform definition of the specific composition of these high performance HR practices. A meta-analysis of the literature by Jiang et al (2012) identified a variety of HR practices that could be considered components of HPWS. These practices were categorised into three dimensions of HR systems: skills-enhancing, motivation-enhancing, and opportunity-enhancing. Jiang et al. observed that these practices include comprehensive recruitment, rigorous selection, and extensive training for skills-enhancing HR bundles. Developmental performance management, competitive compensation, incentives and rewards, extensive benefits, promotion and career development, and job security were examples of motivation-enhancing