“…Over the years, several variations have been reported for the Ritter reaction to achieve higher yields with better chemoselectivity under milder and environmentally acceptable conditions. These variations include the use of Nafion-H as a solid catalyst, 5,6 Nafion-H along with microwave irradiation, 7 formic acid under reflux, 8 HBF 4 ?Et 2 O, 9 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid, 10 HClO 4 -functiona-lized silica-coated nanoparticles, 11 liquid HF, 12 TMSCN/H 2 SO 4 as a reagent for the synthesis of formamides, 13 pentafluorophenyl ammonium triflate (PFPAT), 14 t-BuOAc instead of t-BuOH as a carbocation source, 15 Tf 2 O/ROH as an in situ source of ROTf, 16 metal complexes, 17 Bi(OTf) 3 and other metallic triflates, 12,18,19 ionic liquids, 20 and SiO 2 -Pr-SO 3 H. 21 However, these methods suffer from several disadvantages, such as high cost, poor availability or toxicity of the reagents, and extended reaction times. Additionally the main drawback of most of the existing methods is that the catalysts decompose during the aqueous workup and their recovery is often impossible.…”