1999
DOI: 10.1109/25.790511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of digital cellular radio systems in Nakagami fading and correlated shadowing environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, under the Nakagami-m fading model, the signal power from the desired transmitter follows a Gamma distribution and the cumulative interference power P I is the sum of independent and non-identically distributed Gamma random variables. Several researchers have investigated the problem of obtaining closed form expressions for the SINR under different fading models [9,10]. These approaches are based on simplistic assumptions such as identically distributed interference powers and integer fading parameter (m) for the Nakagami-m fading channel.…”
Section: Node Isolation Probability For Different Fading Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, under the Nakagami-m fading model, the signal power from the desired transmitter follows a Gamma distribution and the cumulative interference power P I is the sum of independent and non-identically distributed Gamma random variables. Several researchers have investigated the problem of obtaining closed form expressions for the SINR under different fading models [9,10]. These approaches are based on simplistic assumptions such as identically distributed interference powers and integer fading parameter (m) for the Nakagami-m fading channel.…”
Section: Node Isolation Probability For Different Fading Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various forms for (2) have been derived in the literature (see e.g. Suzuki [3], Tjhung and Chai [4] and Abdel-Hafez and Safak [5]). A distribution that is more flexible than (1) is the well known Weibull distribution given by the pdf…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where, E i = E{|h s i x p | 2 } is the mean value of the signal power as received at the RF front-end of the i th CR receiver and = E i =N 0 is the average SNR associated with the ith sensing link [6], [7], [8]. For local spectrum sensing, Y s i is compared with a given threshold i to infer the primary state θ.…”
Section: Fig1 System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%