2017
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2017915339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of VoIP in WiFi Campus Network

Abstract: Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service is growing very fast. Service providers offer VoIP service along with traditional data services using the same IP infrastructure. That is why today it is one of the most dominant technologies for communication. In this paper, simulative investigations have been done for VoIP service in WiFi campus network.Step by step, increasing the number of calls, investigations have been done in terms of important Quality of Service parameters like jitter, packet end-to-end delay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies on evaluating the VoIP performance have been conducted in the related literature (Ahmed, 2017;Alharbi, Bahnasse, & Talea, 2017;Audah, Kamal, Abdullah, Hamzah, & Razak, 2015;Cao & Gregory, 2008;Chaudhary & Singh, 2014;Birke, Mellia, Petracca, & Rossi, 2007;Brak, Bouhorma, El Brak, & Bohdhir, 2013;Gurrapu, Mehta, & Panbude, 2016;Li, Chiang, Calderbank, & Diggavi, 2007;Meeran, Annus, & Le Moullec, 2017;Balan, Eggert, Niccolini, & Brunner, 2007;Haibeh, Hakem, & Safia, 2017;Perwej & Parwej, 2012;Tariq, Azad, Beuran, & Shinoda, 2013). Particularly, the studies in (Ahmed, 2017;Alharbi et al, 2017;Audah et al, 2015;Cao & Gregory, 2008;Chaudhary & Singh, 2014) focused on evaluating the performance of VoIP at the IP level, assessing objective parameters such as delays, jitter and packet losses, rather than evaluating the performance of VoIP at user-level which takes into account the user perception, i.e. the MOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on evaluating the VoIP performance have been conducted in the related literature (Ahmed, 2017;Alharbi, Bahnasse, & Talea, 2017;Audah, Kamal, Abdullah, Hamzah, & Razak, 2015;Cao & Gregory, 2008;Chaudhary & Singh, 2014;Birke, Mellia, Petracca, & Rossi, 2007;Brak, Bouhorma, El Brak, & Bohdhir, 2013;Gurrapu, Mehta, & Panbude, 2016;Li, Chiang, Calderbank, & Diggavi, 2007;Meeran, Annus, & Le Moullec, 2017;Balan, Eggert, Niccolini, & Brunner, 2007;Haibeh, Hakem, & Safia, 2017;Perwej & Parwej, 2012;Tariq, Azad, Beuran, & Shinoda, 2013). Particularly, the studies in (Ahmed, 2017;Alharbi et al, 2017;Audah et al, 2015;Cao & Gregory, 2008;Chaudhary & Singh, 2014) focused on evaluating the performance of VoIP at the IP level, assessing objective parameters such as delays, jitter and packet losses, rather than evaluating the performance of VoIP at user-level which takes into account the user perception, i.e. the MOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%