2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-010-1326-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance characteristics of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for detection of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in children

Abstract: Rapid tests for diagnosis of influenza are valuable assets in the management of influenza in pediatric patients. However, test performance fluctuates with virus subtypes. We assessed the test characteristics of Influenzatop®, a rapid immunochromatographic influenza A and B test, in detecting pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in children up to 18 years of age, using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the gold standard. Three hundred and one pediatric outpatients with influenzalike illnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad viral sensitivity of this assay may be a distinct advantage over pathogen-based antigen or PCR testing should a new influenza virus, or potentially other viral type, begin to circulate in the community. Such an advantage might have been demonstrated in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic when traditional antigen-based influenza A testing failed to detect most of the adults infected with the new H1N1 influenza virus (7), delaying appropriate treatment and identification of the causative agent. This assay may also have proved advantageous in the more recent H3N2 influenza virus outbreak in 2012 (17) or in other new influenza virus outbreaks such as the recent avian influenza A virus subtype H7N9 outbreak (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad viral sensitivity of this assay may be a distinct advantage over pathogen-based antigen or PCR testing should a new influenza virus, or potentially other viral type, begin to circulate in the community. Such an advantage might have been demonstrated in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic when traditional antigen-based influenza A testing failed to detect most of the adults infected with the new H1N1 influenza virus (7), delaying appropriate treatment and identification of the causative agent. This assay may also have proved advantageous in the more recent H3N2 influenza virus outbreak in 2012 (17) or in other new influenza virus outbreaks such as the recent avian influenza A virus subtype H7N9 outbreak (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predict that the condition of suspension buffer, membrane, and antibodies were the reason why conventional IC has dramatically improved since 2006, when a report was published by Keitel et al . [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IC is rapid and easy to use, but has a relatively low sensitivity [40,41]. The specificity is >90%, whereas the sensitivity is only ~60%.…”
Section: Immunochromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity is >90%, whereas the sensitivity is only ~60%. Thus, the technique is not suitable for the diagnosis of IAVs in the early stages of infection [41]. For detection of the H5 strain, the sensitivity of IC using H5-specific antibody was reported to be 10 4.5 –10 6 50 % egg infectious dose (EID 50 )/mL [42].…”
Section: Immunochromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%