Performance Comparison of DSDV and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Spaho, Evjola; Ikeda, Makoto; Barolli, Leonard; Xhafa, Fatos; Biberaj, Aleksander; Iwashige, Jiro

doi:10.1109/aina.2012.56

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two of the most popular proactive protocols are DSDV [9] and OLSR [10], but there are many others. For instance, performance comparison of DSDV and Dynamic MANET On-demand (DYMO) [27] protocols for VANETs in OMNET++ simulator is given in [28]. Reactive (on-demand) routing protocols generate route discovery only when it is needed.…”

Section: Generalmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Performance Evaluation of VANETs Using NS-3 Simulator

Malnar

Jevtić

2020

PROMET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last decade, the number of vehicles on roads has been rapidly growing. Therefore, the demands for communication on the move are also increasing and the attention from many researchers is focused on the Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs) because of their importance for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs). Due to the complexity and cost of practical evaluation of VANETs, the researchers often rely on network simulation in order to evaluate their work. In this paper, we have developed a Network Simulator 3 (NS-3) based framework for VANETs that provides network performance analysis based on the key performance indicators such as throughput, packet loss ratio, overhead, end-to-end delay, jitter, etc. Since VANETs are highly dynamic networks, many researchers have proposed different routing protocols in order to improve the network performance. In this paper we have compared several topology-based routing protocols, and proposed utilization of the commonly used Expected Transmission Count (ETX) metric to improve VANET performance.

show abstract

Section: Generalmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Performance Evaluation of VANETs Using NS-3 Simulator

Malnar

Jevtić

2020

PROMET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to the unique nature of the vehicular network, the device discovery process time also needs to minimize, reducing the overall latency and delay [34]. 2) Packet delivery ratio (PDR) -is related to the number of packet send over the number of packets received [35]. PDR is an important parameter to determine the level of congestion in the network.…”

Section: Performance Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Congestion Avoidance in Vehicular Networks: A Contemporary Survey

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congestion in vehicular ad hoc networks affects the performance of delay-sensitive applications when exchanging emergency or general information sharing messages. In particular, during emergencies on roads like road accidents and security warnings demand high reliability and low latency. However, in traditional solutions, such messages use the same control channel for transmission leading up to a saturated or congested channel. Furthermore, the highly dynamic nature of vehicular networks leading up to unpredictable routing patterns, subsequently degrading the network performance. An uneven deliverance of these critical messages can be catastrophic for the delay-sensitive applications. Thus, congestion control remains one of the most challenging problems within the domain of vehicular networks. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the working of vehicular networks, the recent research advances to cater for congestion in such networks, and open problems and challenges relevant to congestion avoidance. INDEX TERMS Ad hoc vehicular network, congestion avoidance, power-based, rate-based, priority-based, clustering-based, CSMA/CA-based, hybrid, vehicular simulation. NOMENCLATURE ACRONYMS

show abstract

“…A routing protocol that results from a modification to the well known Distributed Bellman Ford algorithm [Hutson et al, 2007], the Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) protocol [Perkins and Bhagwat, 1994] is a routing solution where looping related issues are efficiently solved. It is a multi-hop pro-active protocol where each node stores a routing table with one entry to all possible destinations and the number of hops to each node [Spaho et al, 2012]. In addition to this, not being dependent of any intermodal coordination mechanism allows the DSDV protocol to be robust solution for routing in MANETs.…”

Section: Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards scalable routing for wireless multi-hop networks

Palma

Curado

2014

2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the cosy embrace of the G.6.6, where many hours have passed by, strong friendship bonds have also been established. We have all laughed, argued, cursed and shot each other but, above all, we have been really good friends. Thank you all that have been part of this journey and, in particular, thank you João Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz and Vítor Bernardo, without you the outcome would not have been the same.Last, but most definitely not least. In all those moments where I was grumpy, harsh, defeated and boring. When I was working at night, weekends and holidays. Every time I needed an "expression check" and revisions.Thank you for being unconditionally by my side, you have played a Stellar role in my life.

show abstract

Performance Comparison of DSDV and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Cited by 12 publications

References 12 publications

A Framework for Performance Evaluation of VANETs Using NS-3 Simulator

A Framework for Performance Evaluation of VANETs Using NS-3 Simulator

Congestion Avoidance in Vehicular Networks: A Contemporary Survey

Towards scalable routing for wireless multi-hop networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About