2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2007.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of scheduling algorithms in network mobility environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advertisements are used to suggest a route to the destination, and solicitation is used to ask for information to the destination [12]. For a network with asymmetric links, A4LP [13], [10] introduced a limited packet forwarding technique. The receiver must qualify a pre-set fitness value by the sender before rebroadcasting a packet.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advertisements are used to suggest a route to the destination, and solicitation is used to ask for information to the destination [12]. For a network with asymmetric links, A4LP [13], [10] introduced a limited packet forwarding technique. The receiver must qualify a pre-set fitness value by the sender before rebroadcasting a packet.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category consists of the schedulers which aim to provide a guaranteed rate for each traffic flow such as Idealized Wireless Fair Queuing (IWFQ) [4], Channel condition Independent Fair Queuing (CIF-Q) [5] and Server Based Fairness Approach (SBFA) [6]. All these schemes are developed on the same basis; they emulate a Generalized Processor Sharing (GPS) scheduler [7] in an error free environment and they use it as a reference model for the actual rate allocation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%