2009
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2009.090880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of energy efficient ethernet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
102
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Table 1 shows that SFE values are relatively low, implying that the overheads of entering LPI mode become more significant as the time spent in LPI mode reduces. Stated another way, this suggests that the benefits of EEE saturate at medium or low loads, unless packets are coalesced as showed in [17]. Our example in [16] for a EEE NIC demonstrated that for a 1 Gb/s link, a 6% traffic load composed of evenly spaced packets prevented the link from entering into LPI mode altogether.…”
Section: Figure 1: Mode Transitions In Energy Efficient Ethernetmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Table 1 shows that SFE values are relatively low, implying that the overheads of entering LPI mode become more significant as the time spent in LPI mode reduces. Stated another way, this suggests that the benefits of EEE saturate at medium or low loads, unless packets are coalesced as showed in [17]. Our example in [16] for a EEE NIC demonstrated that for a 1 Gb/s link, a 6% traffic load composed of evenly spaced packets prevented the link from entering into LPI mode altogether.…”
Section: Figure 1: Mode Transitions In Energy Efficient Ethernetmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This time can be reduced by the transition overheads associated with activating (T w ) and putting it into LPI mode (T s ). During those transitions, there is significant energy consumption and the transition times are large compared with the frame transmission time [16,17]. The transition times for the different speeds are summarized in Table 1 and compared with the frame transmission times for a 1518 byte and a 64 byte packet.…”
Section: Figure 1: Mode Transitions In Energy Efficient Ethernetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations the energy consumption in the low power mode was assumed to be 10% that during active mode and during mode transitions [7]. Figure 4 Energy Consumption versus loadfor 1,500 and 9,000 byte frames for JOGBase-T.…”
Section: Effects Of a Larger Mtu On Energy Efficient Ethernetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EEE, there is significant power consumption in active mode and during transitions, whereas large savings are achieved in low power mode. However, when isolated frames are transmitted frequently, there is a significant overhead due to mode transitions since the frame transmission times can be shorter than the frame transition times themselves [7]. For example, a 1,500-byte frame takes 120us, 12us or l.2us to be transmitted at 100Mbps, 1 Gbps and IOGbps, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple policy would be to enter Active mode when packets are queued in the transmit queue in the interface and enter LPI mode when the queue is empty. Such a policy has been found to be inefficient (that is, wasteful of energy) due to excessive transitions between the Active and LPI modes [25]. Each transition incurs a delay and energy use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%