Proceedings 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2002
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2002.1016674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of selected job management systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other performance metrics are closely related with different workloads. For parallel batch jobs or MapReduce jobs, the major concern of an SP is the throughput in terms of the number of completed jobs [3] [8]; while the main concern of end users is the average turnaround time per job, which is the average time from submitting jobs till completing them [8] [10]. For Web servers and search engines, the major concern of an SP is the throughput in terms of requests per second [5] [7], while the quality of service in terms of the average response time per request is the major concern of end users [5] [7].…”
Section: Ieee Transactions On Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other performance metrics are closely related with different workloads. For parallel batch jobs or MapReduce jobs, the major concern of an SP is the throughput in terms of the number of completed jobs [3] [8]; while the main concern of end users is the average turnaround time per job, which is the average time from submitting jobs till completing them [8] [10]. For Web servers and search engines, the major concern of an SP is the throughput in terms of requests per second [5] [7], while the quality of service in terms of the average response time per request is the major concern of end users [5] [7].…”
Section: Ieee Transactions On Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For parallel batch jobs, the metrics are as follows: we choose the well known metricsthe throughput in terms of the number of completed jobs [3] [11] to reflect the major concern of a service provider. We use the average turnaround time per job to measure the main concern of end users.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the average turnaround time per job to measure the main concern of end users. The average turnaround time of jobs is the time from submitting a job till completing it, averaged over all jobs submitted [11] [20]. For Web service, the metrics are as follows: we choose the well-know metrics, the throughput in terms of requests per second to reflect the major concern of a service provider [6] [10].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose the number of completed jobs in a certain period [16] to evaluate the performance metric of the HTC service providers; and we choose tasks per second [1] to reflect the performance metric of the MTC service providers. For a service provider, we choose the resource consumption in terms of node*hour to evaluate the cost.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%