2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of surface-organic grafting on the palygorskite nanofiber for the modification of asphalt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our previous research [ 19 , 21 ], Pal was treated with 1 mol/L HCl solution at 60 °C for 1 h to remove some large particles and cationics outside the raw material, then washed to neutral and dried. The treated Pal and γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) were dispersed in xylene solution, and the condensation reflux method was used for magnetic stirring for 10 h, then washed several times with the filtrate, dried and crushed to obtain A-Pal to enhance compatibility with the asphalt matrix.…”
Section: Materials Preparation and Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our previous research [ 19 , 21 ], Pal was treated with 1 mol/L HCl solution at 60 °C for 1 h to remove some large particles and cationics outside the raw material, then washed to neutral and dried. The treated Pal and γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) were dispersed in xylene solution, and the condensation reflux method was used for magnetic stirring for 10 h, then washed several times with the filtrate, dried and crushed to obtain A-Pal to enhance compatibility with the asphalt matrix.…”
Section: Materials Preparation and Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness. According to the roughness coefficient JRC 2D of 9 contours of the aggregate surface, the 3D average roughness JRC of the analysis area of the aggregate surface was calculated to be 14.6 via equation (6). e texture feature of the analysis area was then evaluated by the 3D contour surface roughness JRC 3D .…”
Section: (3) Evaluation Accuracy Of 3d Contour Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock aggregates are commonly used raw materials in the field of road engineering, and their surface roughness significantly affects the performance of asphalt mixtures [1]. e rough surface is beneficial to increasing the contact area between the aggregate and asphalt, thereby creating a certain penetration depth of the asphalt, increasing the thickness of the asphalt film, and enhancing the physical adsorption of the two materials on the contact surface [2][3][4][5][6]. Additionally, there are many fine protrusions on the surfaces of aggregates, which is conducive to the formation of the aggregate skeleton structure of the asphalt mixture during the mixing process, thereby endowing asphalt concrete with good shear strength and ultimately improving the rutting resistance of the road surface [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of lignin modifier results in the absorption of bitumen liquid phase into the bitumen-lignin interacting area during the mixing process, which forms the bitumen-lignin working system and changing the viscoelastic behavior of bitumen binders. Conventional bitumen modifiers include styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS polymer [ 5 , 6 ], crumb rubber [ 7 , 8 ], bio oil [ 9 ], plastics [ 10 ] and various fibers [ 11 , 12 ]. The main components of raw bitumen are statures, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes, which have compatibility with the above-mentioned modifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%