“…The presented results demonstrate that both Panther Fusion and comparator technologies produced comparable results for detection of the viruses responsible for most of the viral respiratory infections, with slightly higher performances for the Panther Fusion respiratory assays [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Similar results have been described when comparing Panther Fusion system to seasonal panels (i.e., Cobas Influenza A/B test (cIAB, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), Xpt (Cepheid, Carlsbad, CA, USA), wide-range panels (i.e., Filmarray respiratory panels 1.7 (RP, BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT, USA), Allplex respiratory panels (Seegene, Seoul, Korea), eSensor RVP (eSensor; Genmark Dx, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Lyra (Quidel, San Diego, CA, USA)) and by laboratory designed tests or sequencing [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. It is important to note that in this study, similarly to others, false results for both the methods are associated with higher Ct values (corresponding to the lowest viral load in the tested samples).…”