International Symposium on Green and Sustainable Technology (Isgst2019) 2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5126549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) with different concentration of powdered activated carbon (PAC) at mesophilic regime in membrane fouling control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For determination of an optimal PAC dosage, a short-term study was implemented with three different PAC dosages, since the excessive dosing could cause more membrane fouling due to PAC being a potential foulant. While 2.5 of the PAC to biomass ratio with 5 g/L of PAC and 2 g/L of MLSS in the previous study showed the best flux improvement, the range of PAC dosages in recent studies regarding PAC addition to AnMBR was 0.4-5 g/L which had less than 1 of PAC to biomass ratio (Akram and Stuckey, 2008;Baêta et al, 2013;Chong, 2015;Park et al, 1999). Thus, the three PAC dosages for the optimisation were determined to be 1, 3, and 5 g/L, within the range of MLSS of the AnMBRs.…”
Section: Powdered Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For determination of an optimal PAC dosage, a short-term study was implemented with three different PAC dosages, since the excessive dosing could cause more membrane fouling due to PAC being a potential foulant. While 2.5 of the PAC to biomass ratio with 5 g/L of PAC and 2 g/L of MLSS in the previous study showed the best flux improvement, the range of PAC dosages in recent studies regarding PAC addition to AnMBR was 0.4-5 g/L which had less than 1 of PAC to biomass ratio (Akram and Stuckey, 2008;Baêta et al, 2013;Chong, 2015;Park et al, 1999). Thus, the three PAC dosages for the optimisation were determined to be 1, 3, and 5 g/L, within the range of MLSS of the AnMBRs.…”
Section: Powdered Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Journal Pre-proof increase, 5 g/L of PAC addition presented almost 25 kPa. This could mean that membrane fouling has not been reduced due to the insufficient PAC doses, however, the highest PAC dosage facilitated more stable sludge properties by effective adsorption and subsequently enlarged floc size (Chong, 2015). In conclusion, based on the best nutrient and COD removals as well as membrane fouling control, 5 g/L of PAC was found to be the optimal dosage for conventional AnMBR, and consequently added for long-term operation of AnMBR.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The active biofilm continues to biodegrade organic compounds as well as to reduce the attachment of microorganisms on the membrane surface so that it can relieve the membrane biofouling [12,24]. In addition, the scouring effect of PAC also alleviates membrane fouling, as it can remove the deposited cake layer on membrane surface while limiting the accumulation of foulants [25]. Figure 1 illustrates the mechanism of fouling reduction when activated carbon is added.…”
Section: Powdered Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when the more PAC concentration of 4 g/L was added, the SMP was rather accumulated while having excellent COD and colour removal efficiency [33,34]. Several studies have revealed that the PAC addition not only decreased turbidity and colour, but also removed potential foulants such as fine colloids and soluble microbial products (SMP), which could lead to the reduction of fouling layer thickness [25,26,35]. Table 1 summarizes the effects of PAC addition on membrane fouling control in submerged AnMBRs.…”
Section: Powdered Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%