2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13398-017-0414-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of some finite difference methods for a 3D advection–diffusion equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a non-uniformly spaced quasi-variable meshes optimum, accurate implicit compact scheme determines the solution values precisely, and the same reflects in tabulated maximum absolute errors and computational orders. In Table 6, the  ∞ -errors using the proposed method at L = 20,  10 2 shows superiority over the existing method [7]. with quasi-variable meshes and uniformly spaced mesh points in Table 7, it is evident that  ∞ -norm errors and convergence order using quasi-variable mesh points high-order compact scheme is better than the uniform meshes high-order scheme.…”
Section: B < mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, a non-uniformly spaced quasi-variable meshes optimum, accurate implicit compact scheme determines the solution values precisely, and the same reflects in tabulated maximum absolute errors and computational orders. In Table 6, the  ∞ -errors using the proposed method at L = 20,  10 2 shows superiority over the existing method [7]. with quasi-variable meshes and uniformly spaced mesh points in Table 7, it is evident that  ∞ -norm errors and convergence order using quasi-variable mesh points high-order compact scheme is better than the uniform meshes high-order scheme.…”
Section: B < mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Researchers may have made an excellent effort to construct a high-order scheme due to computational efficiency and reasonable accuracy [4][5][6]. In recent years, compact finite-difference discretization has been delineated for linear time-dependent convection-diffusion equations in [7][8][9][10][11]. Karaa and Othman [12] described a two-level high-resolution difference method to obtain the numerical approximations of three-dimensional ADEs with mixed derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques used in CAA to construct methods have been modified in order to optimize parameters to minimize dispersion or both dispersion and dissipation in a given scheme and the work is detailed in [17,23,[31][32][33].…”
Section: Optimization To Construct Low Dispersion Low Dissipation Schmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both optimization techniques dealt with minimization of the numerical dispersion [23]. An optimization technique was used on fourth-order finite difference method discretizing 3-D advection diffusion equation [33]. An optimal time step size was computed when spatial mesh size is fixed as h = 0.05.…”
Section: -D Advection-diffusion Equation Given Bymentioning
confidence: 99%