Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis 2005
DOI: 10.1002/3527604685.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Parameters, Calculations and Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The residuals were randomly scattered and showed a condition of homoscedasticity. The highest residual corresponded to 1.4% of the signal of the 100% concentration, which is within the limit of 5% for LC‐UV (Ermer, 2005a). The point (0,0) fell within the calibration curve since zero was included in the confidence interval, meaning that a single‐point calibration is allowed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The residuals were randomly scattered and showed a condition of homoscedasticity. The highest residual corresponded to 1.4% of the signal of the 100% concentration, which is within the limit of 5% for LC‐UV (Ermer, 2005a). The point (0,0) fell within the calibration curve since zero was included in the confidence interval, meaning that a single‐point calibration is allowed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Limits of detection and quantitation. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were estimated statistically from a diluted calibration curve (0.01-1.60 mg/mL of AA), as 3*SE/S and 10*SE/S respectively (Ermer et al, 2005;Hibbert, 2007), where SE is the standard error of the regression and S the slope of the curve. In addition, the LOD and LOQ were estimated empirically, by progressively measuring AA in serially diluted AA standard solutions (0.01-0.2 mg/mL).…”
Section: Analysis Of Certified Reference Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the within-days RSD (1.45%) and the between-days RSD (1.36%) are in the same order of magnitude, the method can be considered to be precise. In addition, the between-days RSD was smaller than the limit (2.11%), calculated by the Horwitz formula: RSD max = 2/3RSD Horwitz in which RSD Horwitz = 2 (1À0.5logC) (Ermer, 2005). The overall average amount of parthenin found in the plant material was 4.71% with an RSD of 1.39%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%