2001
DOI: 10.1109/9.920799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance preserving controller reduction via additive perturbation of the closed-loop transfer function

Abstract: In this note, a new performance preserving controller order reduction method is proposed. Here performance preservation indicates that the norm bound of the closed loop transfer function with reduced-order controller is not greater than the norm bound of the closed loop transfer function with full order controller. We assume additive perturbations to the closed-loop transfer function and obtain a sufficient condition for performance preservation. Two kinds of useful weightings are derived, and the controller r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal dynamics of an experimental highly maneuverable (HIMAT) airplane make a well-known benchmark example for reduced-order robust controller design [17], [30]. The generalized plant has 20 states and the optimal H ∞ norm achieved in closed-loop by a full-order controller is 0.9708.…”
Section: Himat Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longitudinal dynamics of an experimental highly maneuverable (HIMAT) airplane make a well-known benchmark example for reduced-order robust controller design [17], [30]. The generalized plant has 20 states and the optimal H ∞ norm achieved in closed-loop by a full-order controller is 0.9708.…”
Section: Himat Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller reduction techniques in [17], [30] use frequency-weighted model reduction preserving H ∞ performance. We applied HIFOO to the HIMAT example as an alternative to controller reduction.…”
Section: Himat Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (9.2) and (9.3) the weights have usually special forms to enforce either closed-loop stability [AL89,LAL90] or to preserve the closed-loop performance bounds for H ∞ controllers [GG98,Gu95,WSL01,EJL01]. The main appeal of coprime factorization based techniques is that in many cases (e.g., feedback controllers resulting from LQG, H 2 or H ∞ designs) fractional representations of the controller can be obtained practically without any computation from the underlying synthesis approach.…”
Section: Controller Reduction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to be useful, the low order controller resulting in this way must provide an acceptable performance degradation of the closed loop behavior. This led to methods which try to enforce also the preservation of closed-loop performance [AL89,GG98,Gu95,WSL01,EJL01].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the effects of such reductions on the stability and performance cannot be determined apriori. However, when reduction is applied to the controller, some sufcient only conditions have been developed to guarantee stability or performance [7] [10]. Reduction of the plant model is usually not preferred since appropriate approximation of the system requires some prior knowledge of the controller [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%