2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-021-05965-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances and Stability Analysis of a Novel 8T1R Non-Volatile SRAM (NVSRAM) versus Variability

Abstract: Static Random-Access Memories (SRAMs) are an integral part of the chip industry, occupying a noticeable share of the memory market due to their high performance and compatibility with CMOS technology. Traditional SRAMs do not have the capacity to retain data after power-off, preventing their use in non-volatile applications. This paper presents a novel Non-Volatile SRAM (NVSRAM) device based on Resistive RAM (RRAM) technology. A comparison between SRAM and the proposed NVSRAM performances is proposed at both c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the proposed characterization methodology can be used as a key enabler for RRAM models calibration. Model calibration can leverage on the parameters extracted from the proposed test chip instead of isolated cells characterized by an important variability [22]. Moreover, variability, including the switching variability, which is included in only a few compact models available in the literature [23][24], can be more accurately analyzed based on our test structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the proposed characterization methodology can be used as a key enabler for RRAM models calibration. Model calibration can leverage on the parameters extracted from the proposed test chip instead of isolated cells characterized by an important variability [22]. Moreover, variability, including the switching variability, which is included in only a few compact models available in the literature [23][24], can be more accurately analyzed based on our test structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%