2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodicity analysis of the radio light curve of the Seyfert galaxy III Zw 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the source of the reflection completely changed over the course of only 11−years between these observations though the illuminating hard X-ray source has remained relatively constant as evidenced by the comparable flux. Considering only the XMM-Newton and Suzaku data in combination with results from radio light curve analysis we hypothesise the cause of the strange behaviour exhibited by III Zw 2 is due to a precessing radio jet, as first mentioned by Brunthaler et al (2003Brunthaler et al ( , 2005, being described in more detail later by Li et al (2010). Brunthaler et al (2003Brunthaler et al ( , 2005) discuss a periodicity of approximately five years of the radio emission from III Zw 2 and mention a precessing jet as a potential explanation to the observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that the source of the reflection completely changed over the course of only 11−years between these observations though the illuminating hard X-ray source has remained relatively constant as evidenced by the comparable flux. Considering only the XMM-Newton and Suzaku data in combination with results from radio light curve analysis we hypothesise the cause of the strange behaviour exhibited by III Zw 2 is due to a precessing radio jet, as first mentioned by Brunthaler et al (2003Brunthaler et al ( , 2005, being described in more detail later by Li et al (2010). Brunthaler et al (2003Brunthaler et al ( , 2005) discuss a periodicity of approximately five years of the radio emission from III Zw 2 and mention a precessing jet as a potential explanation to the observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The radio emission from III Zw 2 is extremely variable, by as much as a factor of 20 (Aller et al 1985) exhibiting a quasi-periodic activity cycle with period P = 5.14 ± 0.19 yr (Li et al 2010). Variability is also present in the optical (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the source exhibits highly fluctuating radio flux density at 37 GHz (more than a factor of ten peak-to-through ratio; Chamani et al 2020), which could be due to variable jet power. It undergoes a recurrent activity roughly every five years (Li et al 2010) with a detected variable gamma-ray emission in the short term (Liao et al 2016). Secondly, the radio morphology is point-like most of the time, but occasionally a blob is ejected (Brunthaler et al 2005;Lister et al 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blazar variabilities have been well studied by many authors (e.g. Chen et al 2014;Li et al 2006Li et al , 2009Li et al , 2010Li et al , 2015Poon et al 2009;Qian et al 2007;Raiteri et al 2003;Sillanpää et al 1988;Xie et al 2008;Zhang et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%