Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images

Nair, Madhu K.; Ludlow, John B.; Tyndall, Donald A.; Platín, Enrique; Denton, G. Dodd

doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90299-2

Cited by 31 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To ensure optimal visualization of the regions of interest, 1 of the investigators enhanced original SPP and LCBCT images through manipulation of the brightness and contrast using each system's software (24). Using a panel of experts (radiologists having experience working with CBCT images), pilot studies were performed to determine optimal enhancement parameters across the different imaging modalities (27). This was done to avoid adverse effect of the variety of observer experience and individual image preferences and to give an equal chance of comparable performance to all observers.…”

Section: Image Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does a Combination of Two Radiographs Increase Accuracy in Detecting Acid-induced Periapical Lesions and Does It Approach the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning?

Soğur

Gröndahl

Baksı

et al. 2012

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Image Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does a Combination of Two Radiographs Increase Accuracy in Detecting Acid-induced Periapical Lesions and Does It Approach the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning?

Soğur

Gröndahl

Baksı

et al. 2012

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As emphasized by Jones & Hunter (19), this method can be applied to solve questions where scientific evidence is contradictory or non-existent. In dentistry, the Delphi technique has been used to assess for example diagnostic methods and healthcare services (20)(21)(22)(23). In the present study, the method was used because no general agreement has so far been reached over the criteria defining an acceptable occlusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of criteria for assessment of occlusal acceptability

Svedström-Oristo

Pietilä

et al. 2002

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no general agreement on criteria that could be applied to distinguish between orthodontically acceptable and non-acceptable occlusions after the completion of dental development. The aim of the present study was to analyse morphological and functional features that could be used as an index to define an acceptable occlusion in young adults. Three expert panels representing specialists in orthodontics and stomatognathic physiology participated in a modified Delphi method. Each panel responded to a questionnaire concerning the usefulness of various occlusal features, and a set of characteristics was selected on the basis of the responses; thereafter, applicability of the chosen characteristics and their cut-offs for an acceptable non-acceptable dichotomy was tested clinically. To obtain a consensus level of 100%, the last panel session was completed with a group discussion. Assessments made using the morphological criteria were compared with those made with the dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. The selected morphological characteristics consisted of overjet, overbite, canine relationship, crossbite, scissors bite and midline deviation. The functional evaluation comprised assessments of discrepancy between the centric relation and the intercuspal position, working- and non-working-side contacts and protrusion contacts. The dental health component and our morphological criteria showed different sensitivity to contact point displacements, interdigitation in buccal segments and increased overbite. This study provides a set of morphological and functional indicators reflecting the current consensus opinion of Finnish professionals. Further studies are needed to analyse the reproducibility of assessment of the characteristics included.

show abstract

“…[19] The efficiency of digital imaging as a diagnostic aid in the alveolar bone evaluation and periodontal lesions has been studied several times. A study by Nair et al [23] found no changes significant to accurately detect alveolar crestal bone comparing the ability of E-speed film and Sidexis CCD (enhanced and unenhanced digital image). Another study by De Smet et al [24] states that there is the considerable accuracy of peri-implant bone level measurements comparing both conventional and digital intraoral imaging process.…”

Section: Diagnostic Utilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent advancements in dental digital radiography

Diwakar¹,

Kamakshi²

2015

JMRPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For more than a century, now radiographs have been taken using radiographic film. Digital imaging has been replacing traditional films in private practice, academic institutions in the last two decades. As use of digital radiography has become more common in the last decade with rapidly evolving changes in the way healthcare is administered, coupled with the amazing recent advances in imaging, many dental professionals are thinking of using digital system as a substitute to conventional film system. This has necessitated a review of the different technologies used for digital imaging in dentistry with broad overview of the principles in digital system, equipment, digital imaging receptors, procurement, enhancement process, transfer, and storage developments along with comparisons of film-based imaging, processing and image analysis.

show abstract

Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images

Cited by 31 publications

References 19 publications

Does a Combination of Two Radiographs Increase Accuracy in Detecting Acid-induced Periapical Lesions and Does It Approach the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning?

Does a Combination of Two Radiographs Increase Accuracy in Detecting Acid-induced Periapical Lesions and Does It Approach the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning?

Selection of criteria for assessment of occlusal acceptability

Recent advancements in dental digital radiography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About