1995
DOI: 10.1038/sc.1995.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of distal motor control in the locked in syndrome. Review of 11 patients

Abstract: We report 11 patients with the locked in syndrome (LIS). The functional outcome was good in four patients with notable motor recovery, but motor deficit remained seriously disturbed in seven patients. All of the patients regained some distal control of finger and toe movements, often allowing functional use of a digital switch. The independence thereby gained is worthwhile, in some patients allowing environment control, communication by means of a computer, and electric wheelchair ambulation. When motor recove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At that moment, she was transferred to a rehabilitation centre where she made slow but progressive improvement. Her left arm power recovered from distal to proximal muscles, as has been noted in LIS patients (Richard et al, 1995). Head movements were possible and permitted communication.…”
Section: Patient Historymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…At that moment, she was transferred to a rehabilitation centre where she made slow but progressive improvement. Her left arm power recovered from distal to proximal muscles, as has been noted in LIS patients (Richard et al, 1995). Head movements were possible and permitted communication.…”
Section: Patient Historymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, motor recovery is futile in a progressive motor neuron disease like ALS and the hope for motor recovery is limited in LIS of vascular origin (Doble et al, 2003). Despite the severe persisting motor deficits in classic LIS, some patients may present improvement (classically showing a distal to proximal progression) and recover voluntary control of head, finger, or foot (Richard et al, 1995;Laureys et al, 2005). Overall, the level of care remains extensive in chronic LIS and patients classically remain dependent on others for activ ities of daily living.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Complete anarthria is secondary to facio-glosso-pharyngo-laryngeal paralysis, also leading to dysphagia and lack of facial expression. 12 Because the supranuclear ocular motor pathways lie more dorsally, there is sparing of the midbrain tectum, leading to communication through eyelid and vertical eye movement. To communicate "yes" can be indicated by one blink or looking up and "no" can be indicated by two blinks or looking down.…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%