2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic disposition of enrofloxacin in brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) after oral and intravenous administrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
41
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following PO administration, the T 1/2ka (0.13 hr) of ENR was shorter compared with 0.82 hr in snakehead fish (Fang et al., ), 1.394 hr in Korean catfish (Kim et al., ), 1.99 hr in turbot scophthalmus maximus (Liang et al., ) and 6.03 hr in seabass (Intorre et al., ); this indicated that ENR was rapidly absorbed in crucian carp after gavage. T 1/2β and AUC of ENR in crucian carp treated orally were 62.17 hr and 162.72 μg hr/ml, respectively; the values were considerably higher than those determined in Korean catfish (Kim et al., ), brown trout (Koc, Uney, Atamanalp, Tumer, & Kaban, ) and snakehead fish (Fang et al., ), while they were considerably lower than those of turbot scophthalmus maximus (Liang et al., ) and European eel (Fang, Yu, Cai, Zhou, & Huang, ). The reason for those differences is not clear.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Parameters Of Enrofloxacin and Ciprofloxacinmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Following PO administration, the T 1/2ka (0.13 hr) of ENR was shorter compared with 0.82 hr in snakehead fish (Fang et al., ), 1.394 hr in Korean catfish (Kim et al., ), 1.99 hr in turbot scophthalmus maximus (Liang et al., ) and 6.03 hr in seabass (Intorre et al., ); this indicated that ENR was rapidly absorbed in crucian carp after gavage. T 1/2β and AUC of ENR in crucian carp treated orally were 62.17 hr and 162.72 μg hr/ml, respectively; the values were considerably higher than those determined in Korean catfish (Kim et al., ), brown trout (Koc, Uney, Atamanalp, Tumer, & Kaban, ) and snakehead fish (Fang et al., ), while they were considerably lower than those of turbot scophthalmus maximus (Liang et al., ) and European eel (Fang, Yu, Cai, Zhou, & Huang, ). The reason for those differences is not clear.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Parameters Of Enrofloxacin and Ciprofloxacinmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…administration was 63.5 and 62.7 h, respectively; the values were considerably longer compared with 17.44 and 38.43 h in Korean catfish (Kim et al. , 2006) and 19.14 and 22.09 h in brown trout (Koc et al. , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In previous studies, the pharmacokinetics of enrofl oxacin in different fi sh species have been described. The two-compartment model was found suitable for simulation in several studies after intravenous or oral administration (Intorre et al, 2000;Gore et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2006;Koc et al, 2009), while a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was suitable for others (Bowser et al, 1992;Jian et al, 2005;Udomkusonsri et al, 2007). These differences might be due to different fi sh species, different water temperatures and/or different experimental protocols.…”
Section: The Comparative Pharmacokinetics Of Enrofl Oxacinmentioning
confidence: 96%