2021
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II study of anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy with panitumumab driven by circulating tumor DNA molecular selection in metastatic colorectal cancer: The CHRONOS trial.

Abstract: 3506 Background: Despite advances in molecular segmentation of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), beyond RAS status therapeutic actionability remains confined to the limited subgroups of ERBB2 amplified, BRAF mutated and MSI-H patients. Optimization of available treatments is therefore warranted. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is often empirically used with some benefit as late-line therapy. We previously found that mutant RAS and EGFR ectodomain clones, which emerge in blood during EGFR b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
56
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase II CRICKET trial tested the cetuximab rechallenge in 28 irinotecan-pretreated, RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients who had received an anti-EGFR-based first-line therapy, with at least PR for > 6 months, followed by PD [35]. After progression to the second-line therapy, patients were retreated with an irinotecan-based chemotherapy and cetuximab.…”
Section: Targeting Egfr (Rechallenge)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase II CRICKET trial tested the cetuximab rechallenge in 28 irinotecan-pretreated, RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients who had received an anti-EGFR-based first-line therapy, with at least PR for > 6 months, followed by PD [35]. After progression to the second-line therapy, patients were retreated with an irinotecan-based chemotherapy and cetuximab.…”
Section: Targeting Egfr (Rechallenge)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, 16 (31%) were mutated in ctDNA for RAS, BRAF or EGFR ectodomain and avoided a useless treatment by anti-EGFR. Of the 36 (39%) triple wild-type patients, 27 were re-challenged by anti-EGFR and obtained an ORR of 30% [155]. Some ongoing studies, such as the prospective RASINTRO study (NCT-03259009) or the randomized FIRE4 trial (NCT02934529) are currently ongoing to confirm the clinical use of liquid biopsy-driven re-challenge and the predictive impact of RAS mutations in ctDNA for the efficacy of anti-EGFR reintroduction treatment in patients with mCRC (Table 3).…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CRC, postoperative serial ctDNA detection identified recurrence before radiological imaging and was predictive of high relapse risk ( Chen et al, 2021 ). ctDNA has suggested a novel therapeutic rechallenge strategy for CRC based on evidence that resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapy extinguish over time off of that therapy ( Misale et al, 2014 ; Parseghian et al, 2019 ; Sartore-Bianchi et al, 2021 ). Moreover, in a prospective real-world study of NSCLC, ctDNA clearance during treatment was correlated with better OS ( Song et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Liquid Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%