1978
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183x001800020002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotype, Fiber Composition, and in vitro Dry Matter Disappearance of Chemically Induced Brown Midrib (bmr) Mutants of Sorghum1

Abstract: Chemically induced brown midrib (bmr) mutants sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) were characterized with regard to phenotype, fiber composition, and in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD). The recessive bmr genes produced brown pigmentation in the leaf midrib and stem of mature plants. Pigmentation varied among mutants in intensity, time of appearance, and degree of fading as plants matured.Stem and leaf samples of mutant and normal plants were analyzed in the laboratory to determine percent cell wall co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
162
2
8

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
162
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated impairing different steps in monolignol biosynthesis results in reddish brown to tan stem and stalk pigmentation, including the CAD and COMT mutants examined in this study (Mackay et al 1997, Tsai et al 1998, Sibout et al 2005, Zhang et al 2006). There are differences in pith and midrib (leaf vein) coloration between bmr6 and bmr12 (Porter et al 1978, Saballos et al 2009), probably because bmr6 and bmr12 block different steps of the monolignol biosynthetic pathway. However, the increased mortality of both H. zea and S. frugiperda on both bmr mutant pith types suggests a common chemical or biochemical resistance factor(s), yet to be identified, which is not related to differences in pith color.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have indicated impairing different steps in monolignol biosynthesis results in reddish brown to tan stem and stalk pigmentation, including the CAD and COMT mutants examined in this study (Mackay et al 1997, Tsai et al 1998, Sibout et al 2005, Zhang et al 2006). There are differences in pith and midrib (leaf vein) coloration between bmr6 and bmr12 (Porter et al 1978, Saballos et al 2009), probably because bmr6 and bmr12 block different steps of the monolignol biosynthetic pathway. However, the increased mortality of both H. zea and S. frugiperda on both bmr mutant pith types suggests a common chemical or biochemical resistance factor(s), yet to be identified, which is not related to differences in pith color.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, effort to improve forage quality through traditional breeding have been hindered by the complexity of this trait and its regulation by many genes, although the sorghum brown midrib (bmr) mutants induced by Porter et al (1978) sparked a major breakthrough in breeding for forage sorghum quality. Forage digestibility, one of the major limitations of ruminant productivity, is negatively correlated with lignin content and is affected by the lignin composition in plant cell walls, whereby lignin causes forage quality to decline (Barrière et al 2003).…”
Section: Sorghummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their biochemical properties, these mutants show a reddish-brown pigment in the leaf midrib and stem. Porter et al (1978) reported that three of the mutants (bmr-6, bmr-12, and bmr-18) appeared most promising to improve forage quality. Since the brown midrib trait is inherited as a simple recessive trait and is closely associated with improved forage digestibility (Barrière & Argillier 1993, Bittinger et al 1981), forage quality can be improved by fixing bmr alleles.…”
Section: Sorghummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic complementation experiments demonstrated that expression of the wild-type OsCAD2 gene was sufficient to restore normal cell wall composition of gh2 plants (Zhang et al 2006). The brown midrib (bmr) mutants of sorghum (Porter et al 1978) are similar to the bm mutants of maize. The abbreviation bmr was adopted to distinguish it from bm, already in use for the sorghum bloomless mutants (Ayyangar and Ponnaiya 1941).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%