2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic Variation across Chromosomal Hybrid Zones of the Common Shrew (Sorex araneus) Indicates Reduced Gene Flow

Abstract: Sorex araneus, the Common shrew, is a species with more than 70 karyotypic races, many of which form parapatric hybrid zones, making it a model for studying chromosomal speciation. Hybrids between races have reduced fitness, but microsatellite markers have demonstrated considerable gene flow between them, calling into question whether the chromosomal barriers actually do contribute to genetic divergence. We studied phenotypic clines across two hybrid zones with especially complex heterozygotes. Hybrids between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spitze ; Polly , Polly et al . ). Although the landmarking scheme may affect the comparisons between extant and fossil groups, the distances we calculated enable comparisons of morphological differences among taxa with differing morphologies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Spitze ; Polly , Polly et al . ). Although the landmarking scheme may affect the comparisons between extant and fossil groups, the distances we calculated enable comparisons of morphological differences among taxa with differing morphologies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Adjacent (peripatric) karyotypic groups of the Common shrew are known to hybridize, presumably after coming back in geographic contact after expanding from isolated glacial refugia [68,70]. Drift is sufficient to explain differences observed between populations across such hybrid zones, but whether the seemingly small differences measured at the present time arose due to drift or whether they are remnants of historically larger differences that have already been lost through gene flow, thus erasing the effects of past selection during refugial isolation, is unclear [71]. Fossil evidence suggests the latter [56,72].…”
Section: Dental Microevolution: Selection or Drift?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of geographical variation in bones and teeth in extant and fossil species indicates that the ‘surfing’ phenomenon also in morphological traits in much the same way as it does in genetic markers (Polly , ; Szuma ; Polly et al . ). Spatially modified pure drift processes could therefore drive seemingly non‐random trait changes in palaeontological sequences, at least in principle, a possibility that should be considered among other alternative models of evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%