2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phi-array: A novel method for fitness visualization and decision making in evolutionary design optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the perspective, the choice of the visualization method heavily depends on the solution encoding. Some often used representations are simple "zebras" and Gonzo's search space view for binary encodings [11,22,71], parallel coordinates and heat maps (also called matrix charts or density plots) for realvalued genotypes [23], graphs and trees for discrete optimization problems [12,61], radial trees for genetic programming [13,26], and domain-specific representations for some real-world problems [21,38,50,63]. In multi-and many-objective problems, the focus of the analysis, and consequently visualization, shifts to the objective space and the challenge of visualizing high-dimensional Pareto front approximations [62].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the perspective, the choice of the visualization method heavily depends on the solution encoding. Some often used representations are simple "zebras" and Gonzo's search space view for binary encodings [11,22,71], parallel coordinates and heat maps (also called matrix charts or density plots) for realvalued genotypes [23], graphs and trees for discrete optimization problems [12,61], radial trees for genetic programming [13,26], and domain-specific representations for some real-world problems [21,38,50,63]. In multi-and many-objective problems, the focus of the analysis, and consequently visualization, shifts to the objective space and the challenge of visualizing high-dimensional Pareto front approximations [62].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…609154. The scalarization of objective functions is further discussed in Mourshed (2006), Mourshed et al (2011). Another approach is to find a set of trade-off solutions that represents the best compromise between the objectives.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the increase in the number of design variables (i.e., factors or aspects) and goals, the reconciliation between conflicts becomes complicated, rendering the conventional 'cognitive' and 'trial and error' approach inefficient for effective decision-making (Mourshed, 2006). To overcome the limitations of cognitive or heuristics based approaches, design automation such as numerical optimization (Caldas, 2008;Mourshed et al, 2011) can be applied where the indices of design factors and their relative ranking are converted into proportional weights on design goals and the solution space is searched algorithmically.…”
Section: Integrating User Perception In Healthcare Facility Designmentioning
confidence: 99%