2008
DOI: 10.2494/photopolymer.21.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photo-resist Removal using Highly Concentrated Ozone Gas-Removal Characteristics of Various Resists-

Abstract: New processing technologies are demanded which produce hyperfine structures for electronic devices and which do not exacerbate environmental problems. We specifically examined photoresist removal technology for this study. Ozone gas of nearly 100% concentration was applied to various photoresists and ion-implanted-photoresists. Results showed that reactivity with ozone gas differs between a novolac resist, which has a benzene ring structure on a main chain, a KrF resist with this structure on a side chain, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained the activation energy of about 23 kJ/mol in the removal of novolak resin with ozone microbubbles. It is reported that the activated energy for photoresist removal with ashing using oxygen plasma is 50 kJ/mol, with ashing using dry ozone is 41.5 kJ/mol, and with atomic hydrogen is 19 kJ/mol, with wet ozone is 28 kJ/mol [17][18][19][20]. In accord with these values of the activated energy, Ozone microbubbles is regarded as efficient procedure of photoresist removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We obtained the activation energy of about 23 kJ/mol in the removal of novolak resin with ozone microbubbles. It is reported that the activated energy for photoresist removal with ashing using oxygen plasma is 50 kJ/mol, with ashing using dry ozone is 41.5 kJ/mol, and with atomic hydrogen is 19 kJ/mol, with wet ozone is 28 kJ/mol [17][18][19][20]. In accord with these values of the activated energy, Ozone microbubbles is regarded as efficient procedure of photoresist removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Poly(methyl methacrylate), which has no C=C bond in the structure, could not be removed from Si wafer by O 3 microbubble. Reactive oxygen species are generally short lifetime, and no significant effect of microbubble on the film removal process confirmed in the previous study [16][17][18][19][20][21]. As further consideration, the degradation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in aqueous solution by using O 3 microbubble was evaluated, and the effect of microbubbles was confirmed by decrease of the molecular weight and amount of total organic carbon (TOC) in PEG aqueous solution [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The peak at the temperature of 100-150 °C should represent the shrinkage by volatilization of the solvent. When the photoresist with surfacehardened layer is heated, the layer explodes by increasing the internal pressure induced by escaped gas from the lower layer [19]. This phenomenon is named as "popping", which is famous problem in the removal of ion-implanted photoresist.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%