“…The assumption of secondary toxicity by a metabolite receives support by various findings. Many effects of quinalphos have been described, which cannot be explained by the molecular properties of the pesticide, including oxidative stress (Gupta et al, 1998;Debnath and Mandal, 2000), compensatory inductions of antioxidant enzymes (Dwivedi et al, 1998;Gupta et al, 1998;Debnath and Mandal, 2000), decrease of the radical scavenger melatonin along with impairment of immunological parameters (Haldar, unpublished data;Behrends et al, 2004), destruction of vitamin E in vivo (Gupta et al, 1998), chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei formation in mice and humans (Pongrac et al, 1989;Rupa et al, 1989Rupa et al, , 1990Rupa et al, , 1991Chauhan et al, 2005), inhibition of mitosis (Chauhan et al, 2005), and estrogenic/antiandrogenic actions Ray et al, 1992;Debnath and Mandal, 2000;Sarkar et al, 2000). In none of these cases, a relationship to the primary action of quinalphos, inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, is obvious.…”