1977
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0891(77)90104-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoconductive HgCdTe detector performance with background variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No spectroscopic evidence of nonlinearity (such as the presence of high frequency overtones of sharp bands) was observed. Very recently Borrello et al (11) have reported that the D* of the MCT detector should vary approximately with the square root of the background flux above a certain threshold, and our results agree quantitatively with their calculations. Hirschfeld (12) has also suggested that part of the reduction in S/N at high photon flux is caused by the increase in photon shot noise.…”
Section: Instrumentationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…No spectroscopic evidence of nonlinearity (such as the presence of high frequency overtones of sharp bands) was observed. Very recently Borrello et al (11) have reported that the D* of the MCT detector should vary approximately with the square root of the background flux above a certain threshold, and our results agree quantitatively with their calculations. Hirschfeld (12) has also suggested that part of the reduction in S/N at high photon flux is caused by the increase in photon shot noise.…”
Section: Instrumentationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It may be seen from this table that for the case of [19] and [20] the experimental values of Q f , N d , τ b and η as reported by these authors vary within the ranges indicated in this table. In view of this, we calculated D * λ for two extreme cases, namely taking a combination of worst and best case values for each of these parameters.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Borrello et al, 1977;Abrams et al, 1994), laboratory tests have shown the emission radiometer instruments to respond nearly linearly to blackbody radiation over much of their measurement range. Assuming such an idealized linear relationship, the instrument is modelled such that detector response S at a given wavenumber ν , altitude z, and incident radiance spectrum I for a given effective viewing angleθ be given by:…”
Section: Instrument Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%