2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ja00212f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon event evaluation for conventional pixelated detectors in energy-dispersive X-ray applications

Abstract: We analyze and compare 6 different approaches for evaluating energy and position of single X-ray photons detected with conventional pixelated detectors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To detect the emitted x-rays, we exploit a charge-coupled device (CCD). The experimental setups are designed to allow a postprocessing, single-photon counting spectra reconstruction ( 26 , 27 ). Single-photon events can be clearly distinguished in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the emitted x-rays, we exploit a charge-coupled device (CCD). The experimental setups are designed to allow a postprocessing, single-photon counting spectra reconstruction ( 26 , 27 ). Single-photon events can be clearly distinguished in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the intensity of the photon signal, which is proportional to the photon energy, and which is usually smeared over several pixels due to charge splitting, can be recovered by software algorithms. [ 87–89 ] This approach provides real energy resolution and allows detection and discrimination of different XRF lines simultaneously, at least in the tender to hard X‐ray range. To date, the probably best‐suited detector for scanning‐free GEXRF with respect to pixel size (down to 36 μm), energy resolution (145 eV at Mn Kα) and frame rate (up to 1000 Hz) is the pnCCD, [ 90 ] which has been used in the investigation of a C‐Ni‐multilayer in the soft X‐ray range.…”
Section: Gexrf Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze the intensities of the pixel clusters on the image recording the MCP irradiated using monoenergetic protons, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1, a numerical method was developed based on the work of Baumann et al 20 Since the number of scattered protons hitting the detector is on the order of a few tens to a few hundreds of protons per camera acquisition, the probability of having two protons hitting the same microchannel within this timeframe is sufficiently low (probability <5 × 10 −4 ) such that we can reasonably assume that the pixel clusters observed on the acquisition image are cones of light emitted by the phosphor from single proton events. The spatial resolution for this kind of MCP detection system is limited by the Point Spread Function (PSF) of phosphor, which generates cones of light spatially larger than the diameter of a microchannel (25 μm) and of the pixel size of the image acquisition system, which, using a lens magnification, relays a surface size on the MCP of 90 μm onto a single CCD pixel.…”
Section: Pixel Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%