2012
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.51.06fb10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoresist Shrinkage Caused by Single-Line Scan of Electron Beam

Abstract: Shrinkage behavior caused by a single-line scan of an electron beam over a photoresist line was observed, including shrinkage distribution in the photoresist-line direction. A new method for evaluating the minute amount shrinkage and the shrinkage distribution caused by a single-line scan was developed. According to the results of evaluations with this method, the shrinkage of an about 50-nm-wide photoresist line caused by a single-line scan is less than 0.1 nm under landing energies of 200, 300, and 500 eV an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM image reflects the shape information of the photoresist pattern after the original shape has been deformed. EB-induced shrinkage has been evaluated in previous works [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Measurement techniques that do not, in principle, cause EB-induced shrinkage, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), are necessary for precise evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEM image reflects the shape information of the photoresist pattern after the original shape has been deformed. EB-induced shrinkage has been evaluated in previous works [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Measurement techniques that do not, in principle, cause EB-induced shrinkage, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), are necessary for precise evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EB-induced shrinkage has been evaluated in previous works 8 13 Measurement techniques that do not, in principle, cause EB-induced shrinkage, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), are necessary for precise evaluation. An example of such a solution in CD measurement is reported in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is well-known as the shrinkage of photoresist, which may cause a systematic error during a measurement. Most of the works on resist shrinkage have been about photoresist materials, such as 193-nm resist, which have been widely using in industry [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the fact that to collect the signal for an SEM image, there is always an EB irradiated on the sample, that makes SEM inspection very challenging to acquire the original sizes of patterns [3]. T. Ohashi et al used only a single-line scan of EB to minimise the shrinkage, but it is far from a typical SEM measurement [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%