1996
DOI: 10.1016/1011-1344(95)07239-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phototoxicity of argon laser irradiation on biofilms of Porphyromonas and Prevotella species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In exogenous PDT, we used TBO as photosensitizer, which was commonly used in periodontitis PDT studies. 6,9 We found out that di®erent kinds of bacteria responded di®erently to TBO-dependent PDT -P :m: was most PDT sensitive in our study. This was consistent with the previous¯nding that the e®ect of periodontitis PDT depended on bacterium species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In exogenous PDT, we used TBO as photosensitizer, which was commonly used in periodontitis PDT studies. 6,9 We found out that di®erent kinds of bacteria responded di®erently to TBO-dependent PDT -P :m: was most PDT sensitive in our study. This was consistent with the previous¯nding that the e®ect of periodontitis PDT depended on bacterium species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[9][10][11][12] In our study, using portable LED phototherapy devices, which are much smaller and less costly with easier access than the light sources in previous studies, we have demonstrated that both exogenous and endogenous PDT have killing e®ects in vitro on P :m:, P :g: and A:a: -the three main pathogenic bacteria in periodontitis. Meanwhile, BKEPs were screened out, which would be helpful to further preclinical or clinical studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…photodynamic treatment) has been reported in the literature (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005), and it has been suggested that this effect is mediated through the production of ROS (Gourmelon et al, 1994). This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that obligate anaerobic oral bacteria (pigmented and non-pigmented) are more susceptible to blue light exposure treatment than facultative ones (Feuerstein et al, 2004;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various studies have demonstrated the antibacterial effect of visible light applied with or without exogenous photosensitizers (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). It was further suggested that light-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the mechanism underlying this phototoxic effect (Gourmelon et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro bactericidal effect of PDT on Gram-negative bacteria was also investigated and it was found to have a high bactericidal effect on Haemophilus parainfluenzae 34 , Prevotella and Porphyromonas species [35][36][37] , Helicobacter mustelae 38 , E. coli B, Acinetobacter baumannii, and P. aeruginosa 39,40 . PDT of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in animal models hasproven to be as successful as in in vitro studies in inactivating the causative bacteria [41][42][43][44][45][46] .…”
Section: Prophylactic Antimicrobials and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%