2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3401-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic comparison and artificial selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, randomization tests are unable to reject the possibility of a significant phylogenetic signal in the data, except for the compactness (C), width of the transition zone (S), and aspect ratio (CSS) for the rib. This justifies the need to account for the effects of phylogenetic pseudoreplication (Garland, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, randomization tests are unable to reject the possibility of a significant phylogenetic signal in the data, except for the compactness (C), width of the transition zone (S), and aspect ratio (CSS) for the rib. This justifies the need to account for the effects of phylogenetic pseudoreplication (Garland, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it has been noted that selection experiments are a modern corollary to the August Krogh Principle: if a suitable model does not exist, then create one (21)! Selection experiments are an excellent way to probe the interrelations among traits, including complex traits, because one can atomize an organism to the desired level, impose selection at that level on a trait of interest, and observe correlated cross-generational changes in other traits (58,60,66,187). They are a good way to test specific hypotheses about putative trade-offs (61) and constraints on the way organisms can evolve (e.g., 205,206,211).…”
Section: Insights Into Evolutionary Pattern and Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are a good way to test specific hypotheses about putative trade-offs (61) and constraints on the way organisms can evolve (e.g., 205,206,211). In particular, they can be a powerful way to demonstrate mechanism, i.e., how organisms work (58,60). For example, one could impose selection on some measure of whole animal performance and then observe a correlated response in one or more lower-level traits that plausibly cause or permit the change in performance.…”
Section: Insights Into Evolutionary Pattern and Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this means that carboxylase-related (but not oxygenase-related) kinetic traits in different species are similar as a consequence of their phylogenetic relationship. Therefore, conventional approaches to measure correlations that assume independence between observations of carboxylase-related kinetic trait values are incorrect, and correlation coefficients computed using such approaches have likely been over-estimated (Felsenstein, 1985; Grafen, 1989; Pagel and Harvey, 1989; Gittleman and Kot, 1990; Abouheif, 1999; Pagel, 1999; Garland, 2001; Blomberg, Garland and Ives, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By extension of this fact, it should be expected that closely related enzymes will generally also have similar kinetics, with the extent of this similarity being dependent on the underlying tree describing the relationship between species. This phenomenon, which is known as phylogenetic signal (also known as phylogenetic co-variation), can cause spurious correlations in measured trait values between species unless the structure of the phylogenetic tree is taken into consideration (Felsenstein, 1985; Grafen, 1989; Pagel and Harvey, 1989; Garland, 2001). Thus, as previous analyses of RuBisCO kinetics have not assessed whether phylogenetic signal exists in RuBisCO kinetic traits, nor accounted for any phylogenetic signal which may exist, it is possible that the observed catalytic trade-offs inferred from the presence of correlations are, either wholly or in part, an artefact caused by phylogenetic signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%