1976
DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(76)90178-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical characteristics of children as related to death and injury for consumer product safety design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were then compared to empirical estimates for fastperson and slowperson users, which were represented by the 10th and 90th percentile times from the data. For sample sizes smaller than 20, it is appropriate to use 10th and 90th, as more extreme percentiles such as 5th and 95th, represent the sample range and are likely to be affected by outlying values, therefore producing inaccuracies (Snyder et al 1975, Lee 1986, Walter 1986). The predicted and empirical task times were compared, and the precision (percentage difference between predicted and empirical) was calculated for each task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were then compared to empirical estimates for fastperson and slowperson users, which were represented by the 10th and 90th percentile times from the data. For sample sizes smaller than 20, it is appropriate to use 10th and 90th, as more extreme percentiles such as 5th and 95th, represent the sample range and are likely to be affected by outlying values, therefore producing inaccuracies (Snyder et al 1975, Lee 1986, Walter 1986). The predicted and empirical task times were compared, and the precision (percentage difference between predicted and empirical) was calculated for each task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARS head mass was 2 kg, which is in the range of a 1 to 6 month old 12 13. We recognise that 2 kg is on the higher end of the range of the head masses, but this simulates the potential worst case scenario where exogenous forces (wedging, crib-sharing partner or other objects) push the face into the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Using anthropometric data, the center of gravity and height of an average 3-year-old is estimated to be 0.754 and 0.930 m from the ground, respectively [19]. The robot base was extended to achieve a higher stability as the child stands on the robot and the center of mass is higher.…”
Section: Extension Of the Robot Basementioning
confidence: 99%