2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.184504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical mechanisms of timing jitter in photon detection by current-carrying superconducting nanowires

Abstract: We studied timing jitter in the appearance of photon counts in meandering nanowires with different fractional amount of bends. Timing jitter, which is the probability density of the random time delay between photon absorption in current-carrying superconducting nanowire and appearance of the normal domain, reveals two different underlying physical scenarios. In the deterministic regime, which is realized at large currents and photon energies, jitter is controlled by position dependent detection threshold in st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FWHM of the distributions are 6.0 ± 0.2 ps and 10.6 ± 0.2 ps at 532 nm and 1550 nm wavelength, respectively. A non-gaussian tail is clearly observed, it becomes more apparent for long wavelengths and low bias currents, this behaviour has also been reported in many studies 16,22,23 , but its origin remains unclear. The jitter energy dependence is plotted in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The FWHM of the distributions are 6.0 ± 0.2 ps and 10.6 ± 0.2 ps at 532 nm and 1550 nm wavelength, respectively. A non-gaussian tail is clearly observed, it becomes more apparent for long wavelengths and low bias currents, this behaviour has also been reported in many studies 16,22,23 , but its origin remains unclear. The jitter energy dependence is plotted in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…We find, that τ d is drastically reduced as the current approaches to the depairing current and timing jitter may be as small as /k B T c (∼ 0.8 ps for superconductor with T c = 10K). We also show that the considered model with position-dependent response predicts stronger deviation of dependence of photon counts on the delay time (in the literature its is called as probability density function (PDF) [4] or instrument response function (IRF) [6,9]) from the Gaussian-like distribution than the hot belt model predicts [9]. We argue that it occurs due to photons absorbed near the edge of the strip which provide the largest delay time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Since jitter has a noticeably asymmetric Gaussian shape in both figure 4(c) and (d), in the inset of both figures two-peaks fitting is shown. According to a previous study [24], in the deterministic regime where jitter is controlled by position-dependent detection threshold in straight parts of meanders, the main peak forms. And the lower side peak is caused in the probabilistic regime where the detector bends contribute.…”
Section: Jitter Measurement and Analysismentioning
confidence: 73%