1998
DOI: 10.1029/98jd00280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of stratospheric clouds during the Antarctic winter of 1995

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hofmann and Deshler, 1991), but the physical state and temperature histories are uncertain here. Lidar measurements from Antarctica have also been interpreted as mixed phase clouds (Gobbi et al, 1998). A large mode in liquid particle size distributions have been noted in previous measurements from Kiruna Deshler et al, 2003), but the formation mechanism could be different in these cases under the influence of mountain leewaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hofmann and Deshler, 1991), but the physical state and temperature histories are uncertain here. Lidar measurements from Antarctica have also been interpreted as mixed phase clouds (Gobbi et al, 1998). A large mode in liquid particle size distributions have been noted in previous measurements from Kiruna Deshler et al, 2003), but the formation mechanism could be different in these cases under the influence of mountain leewaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For the stable Antarctic conditions, the seasonal chronology of different PSC types is well documented from long-term lidar observations (Gobbi et al, 1998;Santacesaria et al, 2001;Adriani et al, 2004), but the relative occurrence frequency of solid and liquid clouds has not been determined so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the droplets are assumed to be spherical, depolarisation lidar measurements allow to identify liquid clouds by their low depolarisation (Gobbi et al, 1998). They typically have a moderate backscatter ratio of R 532 nm ≈2-8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gobbi et al, 1998;Stein et al, 1999;Toon et al, 2000;Biele et al, 2001). In this case, the interpretation of the PSC data in terms of the two coexisting particle classes can be improved if backscatter coefficients (or backscatter ratios) are studied separately for both states of polarization, since droplet scattering adds to the parallel-polarized lidar signal alone (single scattering assumed) whereas the light backscattered from nonspherical solid particles has both parallel-and perpendicular-polarized components.…”
Section: Polarization-sensitive Backscatter Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%