Three different numerical strategies are presented for the estimation of the damping force acting on perforated movable MEMS dampers. Results from the 2D Perforated Profile Reynolds (PPR) method and the simplified 2D ANSYS method are compared with accurate full 3D flow simulations. Altogether, 32 different topologies are compared varying, e.g., the dimensions of the square damper and the square holes, and the number of holes. The case of uniform perforation and perpendicular motion is studied. Oscillation in the low frequency regime is assumed, that is, the compressibility and inertia of the gas are ignored in the study. While the PPR method is in good agreement with the 3D simulations, the forces given by the ANSYS method were considerably smaller. The reasons for this are studied, and a compact expression to explain the small forces is derived.