2020
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical Tools for Visualizing and Quantifying Cell-Generated Forces

Abstract: To discern how mechanical forces coordinate biological outcomes, methods that map cell-generated forces in a spatiotemporal manner, and at cellular length scales, are critical. In their native environment, whether it be within compact multicellular three-dimensional structures or sparsely populated fibrillar networks of the extracellular matrix, cells are constantly exposed to a slew of physical forces acting on them from all directions. At the same time, cells exert highly localized forces of their own on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To visualize the miniscule level of force ranging from pN to nN, different methods have been developed, such as traction force microscopy (TFM) [69][70][71] and single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) including atomic force microscopy, [72][73][74] optical or magnetic tweezers, 75,76 etc. Among them, TFM is only sensitive to forces at the nN level, while the SMFS methods fail to capture the mechanics of a whole cell because of their low throughput.…”
Section: Mtfm For Mapping the Cell-matrix Adhesion Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To visualize the miniscule level of force ranging from pN to nN, different methods have been developed, such as traction force microscopy (TFM) [69][70][71] and single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) including atomic force microscopy, [72][73][74] optical or magnetic tweezers, 75,76 etc. Among them, TFM is only sensitive to forces at the nN level, while the SMFS methods fail to capture the mechanics of a whole cell because of their low throughput.…”
Section: Mtfm For Mapping the Cell-matrix Adhesion Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pillar arrays are typically made of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and characterised by pillar dimensions and spacing 187 . As cells spread and migrate across the tops of the pillar arrays, the contractile forces generated by the cells cause the pillars to bend laterally, and the cellular traction forces can then be directly calculated using classical beam theory after capturing the pillar deflections by optical microscopy 188,189 . The second method is based on the use of tiny fluorescent beads which are embedded in or attached to the surface of an elastic hydrogel substrate (polyacrylamide (PAA) or silicon‐based gels are commonly used substrates) 190 .…”
Section: Combining Afm With Tfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been developed to quantify and characterize the mechanical microenvironment that cells live in, and have been designed to measure both cell-generated forces and mechanical properties of cells and tissues. Overviews of force measurement and mechanical characterization methods are extensively reviewed elsewhere (Polacheck and Chen, 2016;Roca-Cusachs et al, 2017;Nguyen and Kilian, 2020;Obenaus et al, 2020), and here we focus specifically on the opportunities and challenges that come with integrating these sensors into OoC and microtissue engineered models, and how real-time, multiplexed, and spatially-defined information about tissue function can be obtained.…”
Section: Measuring Mechanics-on-a-chipmentioning
confidence: 99%