2022
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PICH Supports Embryonic Hematopoiesis by Suppressing a cGAS‐STING‐Mediated Interferon Response

Abstract: The Plk1‐interacting checkpoint helicase (PICH) protein localizes to ultrafine anaphase DNA bridges in mitosis along with a complex of DNA repair proteins. Previous studies show PICH deficiency‐induced embryonic lethality in mice. However, the function of PICH that is required to suppress embryonic lethality in PICH‐deficient mammals remains to be determined. Previous clinical studies suggest a link between PICH deficiency and the onset of acquired aplastic anemia. Here, using Pich knock‐out (KO) mouse models,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such dsDNA is likely to be generated from the damaged bridge DNA. [ 37 ] We conclude that the extensive formation of chromatin bridges induces both the formation of micronuclei and cytosolic dsDNA in the absence of ANKLE1‐mediated bridge processing, leading to the activation of cGAS‐STING pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such dsDNA is likely to be generated from the damaged bridge DNA. [ 37 ] We conclude that the extensive formation of chromatin bridges induces both the formation of micronuclei and cytosolic dsDNA in the absence of ANKLE1‐mediated bridge processing, leading to the activation of cGAS‐STING pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Type I IFNs block maturation of HSPCs, a process that is attenuated by inhibition of the cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS ( 14 ). Given the increased prevalence of micronuclei that may expose genomic DNA through porous nuclear membranes and accumulation of cytosolic R-loops in our murine models and primary specimens, we next examined whether cGAS engages these sources of cytoplasmic DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type I interferons block maturation of HSPCs, a process that is attenuated by inhibition of the cytosolic DNA sensor, cGAS. (14) Given the increased prevalence of micronuclei that may expose genomic DNA through porous nuclear membranes, and accumulation of cytosolic R-loops in our murine models and primary specimens, we next examined whether cGAS engages these sources of cytoplasmic DNA. We first used immunofluorescence staining to demonstrate cGAS colocalization with both micronuclei (Figure 2A) and cytoplasmic R-loops (Figure 2B) and indeed found that cGAS interacted with both in MDS BM-MNCs as well as the murine mutation variants.…”
Section: Cgas Is Activated By Cytoplasmic Dna In Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HMGB1 could promote the activation of DCs to phagocytose apoptotic tumor cells, bind toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to facilitate DC maturation, and enhance antigen presentation to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) . While ATP could stimulate the infiltration of CTLs in the tumor microenvironment, chemotherapeutic drug-induced damage of DNA could also enhance cGAS-STING-mediated type I interferon (IFN) response to activate anti-tumor immune responses. , At the same time, ICD could enhance the translocation of CRT molecules, an “eat me” pro-phagocytosis signal that interacts with the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), facilitating its recognition by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and acting as a critical molecular component in promoting ICD to the plasma membrane of tumor cells, which could induce tumor-associated macrophages (M2 phenotype) to transform into a phenotype with antitumor activity (M1 phenotype). , Hence, not only will the strategy that combines the CD47 blockade with chemotherapy-induced ICD significantly improve anticancer therapeutic efficacy but also considerably increase the beneficiary population of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%