2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2657336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picking Winners and Losers: A Structural Examination of Tax Subsidies to the Energy Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generates an implicit prejudice for the alternatives remaining after the choice of the specific subject of tax credit (Tracey, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This generates an implicit prejudice for the alternatives remaining after the choice of the specific subject of tax credit (Tracey, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…", others (see, e.g., Mannix 2018) complain that at most, government should confine its interventions to cases where a new technology is not safe or effective in absolute, not relative terms. We cannot resolve this controversy here, but simply note that (1) government erects barriers to new technologies all the time, particularly by providing subsidies to established technologies (Roberts 2016); and (2) because the risk-reducing and risk-creating powers technologies have are often far harder for society to discern and weigh than the market attributes of these technologies (e.g., cost, usefulness, taste, appearance), the free market is often incapable of favoring "winners" that truly provide welfare-increasing results. While this profound policy controversy continues, we believe that identifying superior solutions to technologies that address identical problems cannot help but enrich the discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%