2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pine pest detection using remote sensing satellite images combined with a multi-scale attention-UNet model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can significantly improve detection accuracy. Ye et al (2022) designed an end-to-end automatic pest detection framework based on a multi-scale attention-UNet ( MA-UNet ) model and monophasic images. Compared with the traditional model, the proposed model achieves a much better recall rate of 57.38% in detecting pest infested forest areas, while the recall rates of the Support Vector Machine ( SVM ), UNet, attention-UNet, and MedT models are 14.38, 49.33, 48.02, and 33.64%, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can significantly improve detection accuracy. Ye et al (2022) designed an end-to-end automatic pest detection framework based on a multi-scale attention-UNet ( MA-UNet ) model and monophasic images. Compared with the traditional model, the proposed model achieves a much better recall rate of 57.38% in detecting pest infested forest areas, while the recall rates of the Support Vector Machine ( SVM ), UNet, attention-UNet, and MedT models are 14.38, 49.33, 48.02, and 33.64%, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are large differences between different regions, different types of forest (e.g., temperate forest and tropical forest), plant formations (e.g., grass, shrubs, mediate trees and upper trees) and disturbance categories (e.g., wildfires, forest insects and diseases), making this method difficult to transfer and apply. Among the image pattern recognition methods, traditional machine learning algorithms such as random forests [15][16][17] and support vector machines [18,19], as well as deep learning algorithms like the UNet model [20], are often utilized to monitor forest disturbance areas. But such methods have high requirements on data quality and availability, and the accuracy is often limited by ground survey data [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic image identification technologies based on computer vision are promising in insect detection, as documented in the literature (Ahmad et al, 2022;Júnior and Rieder, 2020;Zacarés et al, 2018). They have been implemented in numerous applications in managing insect disease vectors and controlling pests, such as agricultural and forest pests (Domingues et al, 2022;Duarte et al, 2022;Mendoza et al, 2023), in the classification of parasitised fruit fly pupae (Marinho et al, 2023), the detection of pine pests (Ye et al, 2022), the segmentation of ecological images featuring (Filali et al, 2022), the identification of whitefly (Kamei, 2023), and the automated counting of mosquito eggs (Javed et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%