2016 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2016.7571563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in measuring discontinuous disturbances with latest click analysers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing electromagnetic interference (EMI) is traditionally based on the spectral components of the interference. This is because time domain analysis was insufficiently accurate due to limitations of hardware, such as the limited analog to digital converter (ADC), sampling rate, memory or dynamic range [1]. The use of a super-heterodyne EMI test receiver is the default choice by analyzing each frequency individually while sweeping through the spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing electromagnetic interference (EMI) is traditionally based on the spectral components of the interference. This is because time domain analysis was insufficiently accurate due to limitations of hardware, such as the limited analog to digital converter (ADC), sampling rate, memory or dynamic range [1]. The use of a super-heterodyne EMI test receiver is the default choice by analyzing each frequency individually while sweeping through the spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing EMI is traditionally based on the spectral components of the interference. This is because time-domain analysis was insufficiently accurate due to limitations of hardware, such as the limited ADC, sampling rate, memory or dynamic range [68]. The use of a super-heterodyne EMI test receiver is the default choice by analyzing each frequency individually while sweeping through the spectrum.…”
Section: Fast Continuous Magnetic Emission Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%