2002
DOI: 10.1086/343894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PKS 1510−089: A Head‐on View of a Relativistic Jet

Abstract: The gamma-ray blazar PKS 1510À089 has a highly superluminal milliarcsecond jet at a position angle (P.A.) of À28 and an arcsecond jet with an initial P.A. of 155 . With a DP.A. of 177 between the arcsecond and milliarcsecond jets, PKS 1510À089 is perhaps the most highly misaligned radio jet ever observed and serves as a graphic example of projection effects in a highly beamed relativistic jet. Here we present the results of observations designed to bridge the gap between the milliarcsecond and arcsecond scales… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum rotation rate of the polarization angle would correspond to the minimum of θ. Similar geometry -albeit on larger scales -has been observed in another blazar, PKS 1510-089 (Homan et al 2002). Nonetheless, in both scenarios, the coherent polarization event is produced by a density pattern co-moving along the jet, and therefore, it is possible to estimate the distance traveled by the emitting material during the flare ∆r event ; this in turn allows us to constrain the distance of the dissipation region from the black hole r event ∆r event ∼ 10 19 (∆t event /20 days) (Γ jet /15) 2 cm , which is ∼ 5 orders of magnitude larger than the gravitational radius of the black hole in 3C 279.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Flare With a Change Of Optical Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The maximum rotation rate of the polarization angle would correspond to the minimum of θ. Similar geometry -albeit on larger scales -has been observed in another blazar, PKS 1510-089 (Homan et al 2002). Nonetheless, in both scenarios, the coherent polarization event is produced by a density pattern co-moving along the jet, and therefore, it is possible to estimate the distance traveled by the emitting material during the flare ∆r event ; this in turn allows us to constrain the distance of the dissipation region from the black hole r event ∆r event ∼ 10 19 (∆t event /20 days) (Γ jet /15) 2 cm , which is ∼ 5 orders of magnitude larger than the gravitational radius of the black hole in 3C 279.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Flare With a Change Of Optical Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This would require, as is being proposed here for most of these sources, that the jet and counter-jet are both at large viewing angles instead of being viewed endon as proposed by [30]. In this scenario there is also evidence that the jets in PKS 1510 -089 switch on and off, as is required to explain intrinsic one-sidedness.…”
Section: Relative Strengths Of the Boosted And Un-boosted Radiationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As noted above, this is because most of these sources would have been detected even without this small amount of boosted radiation from the jet, and their distribution of orientations must then be close to random. In particular, we note that the outer jet in PKS 1510-089 has been found, in the CR model, to be directed at an angle of between 12˚ -24˚ from the line-of-sight [30]. This means that its radiation would not be significantly boosted.…”
Section: Relative Strengths Of the Boosted And Un-boosted Radiationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Lorentz factors (and Doppler factors) thus derived are of the order of ten for general samples of AGNs (Vermeulen & Cohen 1994), but may be higher for AGNs showing prominent gamma-ray emission (e.g. Homan et al 2002Homan et al , 2003. The range of Lorentz factors prevalent at the time of gamma-ray emission, which presumably occurs before the emission region becomes visible at radio frequencies, is not known, but is likely higher than ten, if the bulk kinetic energy of the jets is the energy reservoir for the particle acceleration (see, e.g., Georganopoulos & Kazanas 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%