2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5124074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar metalenses in the mid-infrared

Abstract: Traditional spherical lenses are bulky and often the limiting factor for the miniaturization of modern smart devices. Metalenses can break the limitations of traditional spherical lenses, allowing for the development of ultra-thin planar lenses. Here, we experimentally demonstrated metalenses in the mid-infrared spectral range by patterning a germanium wafer using standard nanofabrication processes. Three 6 mm × 6 mm planar lenses operating at 3μm, 5μm and 8μm were fabricated and characterized. The results sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iScience Review the view point of lower aspect ratio and high producibility in fabrication compared with the dielectric material (Liang et al, 2019) Both refractive index and absorption coefficient vary with wavelength, so the most suitable dielectric material is determined by the wavelength range in which the lens is to be used (Liang et al, 2019). For example, germanium (Ge) and silicon (Si) are suitable for use in the infrared band (Wang et al, 2019(Wang et al, , 2020a, titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) and gallium nitride (GaN) are suitable for the visible band (Khorasaninejad et al, 2017a;Huang et al, 2020), and hafnium oxide (HfO 2 ) and aluminum nitride (AlN) are suitable for the UV band (Zhang et al, 2020a;Guo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metalens Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iScience Review the view point of lower aspect ratio and high producibility in fabrication compared with the dielectric material (Liang et al, 2019) Both refractive index and absorption coefficient vary with wavelength, so the most suitable dielectric material is determined by the wavelength range in which the lens is to be used (Liang et al, 2019). For example, germanium (Ge) and silicon (Si) are suitable for use in the infrared band (Wang et al, 2019(Wang et al, , 2020a, titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) and gallium nitride (GaN) are suitable for the visible band (Khorasaninejad et al, 2017a;Huang et al, 2020), and hafnium oxide (HfO 2 ) and aluminum nitride (AlN) are suitable for the UV band (Zhang et al, 2020a;Guo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metalens Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight difference can be contributed to the fact that theoretical calculations assume perfect phase distributions and uniform amplitude. Since the designed metalens is a one-dimensional focusing lens, both theoretical and simulated radiuses are smaller than diffraction-limit (λ/2NA = 10.6 μm, NA = 0.5 is the numerical aperture) 46,47 . However, the YLP incidence is not allowed to be transmitted by the designed metalens, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Design Of Deflector and Metalensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBL consists of patterning the desired shape directly on the negative or positive resist with a Gaussian electron beam with a diameter in the angstrom scale. However, this technique cannot be applied to low-cost and large-area manufacturing because the transfer of the full pattern onto the resist requires longer processing times (the beam is focused on a single point of pattern at a time), implying high operating costs [5,17,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%