2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant community effects on the diversity and pathogen suppressive activity of soil streptomycetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deeper understanding of the diverse roles of antibiotics in species interactions in soil, the dynamics of antibiotic inhibition in natural habitats and especially the factors that may determine the potential for a coevolutionary arms race vs coevolutionary differentiation are crucial for understanding the long-term trajectories of antibiotic-producing microbes in soil. Recent work suggests the potential for soil edaphic characteristics, nutrient availability or nutrient diversity in soil, physical environmental stress and phylogeny to predict microbial inhibitory activities and coevolutionary interactions in soil populations (Schlatter et al, 2009;Bakker et al, 2010;Kinkel et al, 2011;Bailey and Kassen, 2012;Otto-Hanson et al, 2013). More detailed understanding of the precise roles of these factors in mediating microbial species interactions and coevolution in soil will contribute significantly to the search for novel antibiotic biochemistries, to enhanced insight into the maintenance of antibiotic resistance genes in environmental microbes and to management of disease suppressive activity of indigenous soil microbes (Martinez et al, 2011;Kinkel et al, 2011;Kinkel et al, 2012 …”
Section: Resistance Interactions Among Sympatric and Allopatric Isolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deeper understanding of the diverse roles of antibiotics in species interactions in soil, the dynamics of antibiotic inhibition in natural habitats and especially the factors that may determine the potential for a coevolutionary arms race vs coevolutionary differentiation are crucial for understanding the long-term trajectories of antibiotic-producing microbes in soil. Recent work suggests the potential for soil edaphic characteristics, nutrient availability or nutrient diversity in soil, physical environmental stress and phylogeny to predict microbial inhibitory activities and coevolutionary interactions in soil populations (Schlatter et al, 2009;Bakker et al, 2010;Kinkel et al, 2011;Bailey and Kassen, 2012;Otto-Hanson et al, 2013). More detailed understanding of the precise roles of these factors in mediating microbial species interactions and coevolution in soil will contribute significantly to the search for novel antibiotic biochemistries, to enhanced insight into the maintenance of antibiotic resistance genes in environmental microbes and to management of disease suppressive activity of indigenous soil microbes (Martinez et al, 2011;Kinkel et al, 2011;Kinkel et al, 2012 …”
Section: Resistance Interactions Among Sympatric and Allopatric Isolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies suggested that healthy plants exhibit higher soil microbial diversity compared to diseased plants (Bakker et al 2010;Brussaard et al 2007), while organic amendments could significantly improve microbial diversity. It has been reported that microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soils negatively correlated with occurrence of soil borne disease and positively correlated with the plant resistance to pathogens (Bailey and Lazarovits 2003;Bulluck and Ristaino 2002;Gamliel et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, root colonizing plant beneficial microorganisms have been used including species of Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. putida, P. aureofaciens) [2024], Bacillus (Bacillus subtilis, B. Polymyxa, and B. cereus) [25–27], non-pathogenic Fusarium [28, 29], and Actinobacteria [3033]. These microbes possess many traits that make them well suited as biocontrol and growth-promoting agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a wide range of antibiotics as well as a variety of enzymes (i.e., chitinases), which degrade the fungal cell wall [3540]. Metabolites from streptomycetes have been used in agriculture as growth promoters [4144] and selected strains of the genus also have been used as direct biocontrol agents for other plant diseases [30, 45–48]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%