1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02551476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant regeneration from cotyledons and embryonic axes in apple: Sites of reaction and effect of pre-culture in the light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Höfer (1994) transferred embryo-derived anthers of apple to MS medium with 0.5 µM TDZ and succeeded in obtaining secondary embryogenesis and adventitious shoots. Cotyledons or the embryonic axis derived from embryos isolated from seeds of apple (Keulemans and de Witte, 1994;Kouider et al, 1984) and pear (Browning et al, 1987) regenerated adventitious shoots. Optimal conditions for shoot differentiation from cotyledons and the embryonic axis should be further examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Höfer (1994) transferred embryo-derived anthers of apple to MS medium with 0.5 µM TDZ and succeeded in obtaining secondary embryogenesis and adventitious shoots. Cotyledons or the embryonic axis derived from embryos isolated from seeds of apple (Keulemans and de Witte, 1994;Kouider et al, 1984) and pear (Browning et al, 1987) regenerated adventitious shoots. Optimal conditions for shoot differentiation from cotyledons and the embryonic axis should be further examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the effect of cotyledon and decapitated embryonic axes explants on percentage of response and number of multiple shoots, the response of embryonic axes was better than cotyledon. Regeneration frequency is generally influenced by the type of explant and embryonic axes reacted better than the cotyledons [49] and whole embryonated cotyledon, sectional embryonated cotyledon, whole de-embryonated cotyledon, sectional de-embryonated cotyledon [50]. This is because of presence of apical and auxiliary meristematic tissue in the embryo axes that are primary sites of shoot regeneration compared to cotyledon which has a lesser amount meristematic tissue that is acquired from the embryonic axes during separation from embryonic axes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…신초 재분화에 있어 서 절편체의 선택은 중요한 요소 중 하나이며, 사과에서 는 원형질체 (Saito and Suzuki. 1999), 생장점으로부터 유도 된 callus (Caboni et al 2000), 자엽과 배축 (Keulemans and de Witte 1994), 엽 절편 (Predieri and Fasolo 1989) 등을 배양재 료로 재분화에 대한 연구가 보고되어 있으며, 배에서는 원형질체 유래 callus (Ochatt and Power 1988), 경정분열조 직 (Lane 1979), 엽 절편 (Chevreau et al 1979) 등을 재료로 하여 재분화에 대한 연구가 보고되어 있다. 배의 경우 주 로 엽 절편체로부터 식물체 재분화에 관한 연구가 보고 되어 있으며 (Leblay et al 1991;Hennayake et al 2003;Lee et al 2002;Chevreau et al 1989), 식물체 정단부 끝 부분에 있는 어린 잎이 아래 부분에 있는 오래된 잎 보다 재분화 에 효율적이라 보고되어 있다 (Chevreau and Leblay 1993 (Kadota et al 2001;Kadota et al 2003), 사과 (Sotiropoulos et al 2006), 살구 (Marino et al 1993), 복숭아 (Ahmad et al 2007)…”
unclassified