2011
DOI: 10.3733/ca.v065n02p73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plants in constructed wetlands help to treat agricultural processing wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study reported that there was a total reduction of 42% of tannin and lignin using the CW planted with a cattail ( Typha sp.). This is in agreement with Grismer and Sherpherd 36 who reported successful reduction of up to 77.9% of tannin and lignin from the winery process wastewater by subsurface flow wetland. Comparing both studies with this study, better removal of tannin and lignin was achieved on day 52 to day 75 of 82.9 ± 0.47%, which is higher than reported literature 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study reported that there was a total reduction of 42% of tannin and lignin using the CW planted with a cattail ( Typha sp.). This is in agreement with Grismer and Sherpherd 36 who reported successful reduction of up to 77.9% of tannin and lignin from the winery process wastewater by subsurface flow wetland. Comparing both studies with this study, better removal of tannin and lignin was achieved on day 52 to day 75 of 82.9 ± 0.47%, which is higher than reported literature 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with Grismer and Sherpherd 36 who reported successful reduction of up to 77.9% of tannin and lignin from the winery process wastewater by subsurface flow wetland. Comparing both studies with this study, better removal of tannin and lignin was achieved on day 52 to day 75 of 82.9 ± 0.47%, which is higher than reported literature 36 , 37 .
Figure 5 The tannin and lignin reduction profile after the treatment using constructed wetland system for 75 days.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in general, direct comparison experiments between planted and unplanted CW give results similar to the present work-planted CWs performed better than unplanted CWs [32,[46][47][48][49]. Among the possible roles of plants in the wastewater treatment processes, the roots surface support for microbial film development and the provided oxidized rhizosphere were pointed out as the principal plants contributions [37,42,50,51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…waters of rain 20 , wastewater of tannery 21 , wastewater of slaughterhouses 22 . Effluent of hog barns 23 , wastewater in agriculture 24 , wastewater containing heavy metals 25 , wastewater of dairy farms 26 . In addition, effluents from Medical Laboratories 27 , The technique has been tested with success for the organic pollution 28 for the elimination of phosphates 29 , of the nitrogen and metals [29][30] , and the elimination of pathogenic germs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%