“…In fact, although the lowest possible power was chosen for the plasma coating deposition to preserve the precursor chemical structure injected into [53,55] -1 720 1 720 C5 5O stretch (aldehyde, ketones, carboxylic acid) [55] -1 680 1 680 C5 5O stretch (amides) [54,55] 1 660 1 660 1 660 C5 5N stretch (imines, oximes) [55,57] 1 440 --CH 3 umbrella bending mode [55] 1 390 --C-N stretch (amines, amides) [55] 1 295 --Si-CH 2 wag, C-C-O stretch (carboxylic acids, alcohols, silanols) [55] -1 470-1 260 1 470-1 260 Discrete absorption for as deposited at 1 440, 1 390, 1 295 cm À1 , N-O asymmetric/symmetric stretch (nitro compounds) [58] 1 169 --C-H rocking in CH 3 in CH 3 CH 2 O- [53] 1 080 1 040 1 040 Si-O-Si/Si-O-C symmetric stretch [55,56] 1 100 1 120 1 120 Si-O-Si asymmetric stretch [53][54][55]57] A deeper investigation of the coating chemical changes were performed both for the thermal and plasma post treatment. In the case of plasma, the effect of different parameters as gas feed (i.e., amount of oxygen from 0 to 20%), treatment time and applied power was evaluated ( Table 2).…”