Selected Topics in Myasthenia Gravis 2019
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmapheresis in Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

Abstract: Treatment of myasthenia gravis is still a rather difficult task, since there is no single tactic to use different drugs (corticosteroids, rituximab, immunoglobulins), especially since it is associated with a number of side effects. They are not able to remove the accumulating autoantibodies and immune complexes, the large size of which does not allow them to be excreted by the kidneys as well. Special problems of treatment arise when myasthenic crises develop associated with respiratory failure requiring artif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary outcomes ( Table 2 ) support the advantages of TPE for superior ventilator status in terms of less intubation with IMV, more NIV, less tracheotomy, and quick response rate in MC reported by others [ 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Our secondary outcomes ( Table 4 ) support the role of TPE for early extubation (≤7 days) as well as the role of NIV for decreasing ventilation duration (≤7 days) reported by others [ 9 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our primary outcomes ( Table 2 ) support the advantages of TPE for superior ventilator status in terms of less intubation with IMV, more NIV, less tracheotomy, and quick response rate in MC reported by others [ 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Our secondary outcomes ( Table 4 ) support the role of TPE for early extubation (≤7 days) as well as the role of NIV for decreasing ventilation duration (≤7 days) reported by others [ 9 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, there is an unmet need for targeted immunomodulatory therapies, which has resulted in an ongoing campaign to develop safer and more effective treatments for MG [ 11 ]. The technological advances for a direct removal of auto-antibodies in patients with MG, such as immunoabsorption [ 12 ], double-filtration plasmapheresis [ 13 ], and nanomembrane-based TPE technology [ 14 ], pose new challenges and perspectives in this context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covered in the last review on blood apheresis technologies [22] Membrane with silicon dioxide nanoparticles Experimental Hemodialysis [23] Membrane with ferric oxide nanoparticles Experimental Hemodialysis [24] Membrane with multi-walled carbon nanotubes Experimental Hemodialysis [25] Membrane with graphene oxide nanoparticles Experimental Hemodialysis [26,27] Not covered in the last review on blood apheresis technologies [22] Membrane with nanoscale pores made of Lavsan film irradiated by accelerated in a collider charged argon particles Clinical TPE [9,[28][29][30][31][32][33]…”
Section: Type Of Nanotechnology Type Of Research Applications Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanomembrane is made of Lavsan film irradiated by accelerated charged argon particles in a collider, creating pores with diameters of 30-50 nm. This allows it to filter molecules with a weight of less than 40 kDa [21][22][23]. In nanomembrane-based LVPE, the most frequently used replacement fluid is saline solution, which has no side effects even when 25-30% of the circulated plasma is separated [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%