1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0081-1947(08)60493-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmas in Solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 636 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the boundary is not static, the analysis of the growth of a precipitate is much more complicated. Glicksmann evaluated the movingboundary problem of 3D precipitate growth in relation to the static-boundary case [22], and found that for small supersaturations the difference is negligible. A similar analysis has been done by Aaron and coworkers in the context of diffusional phase transformations [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If the boundary is not static, the analysis of the growth of a precipitate is much more complicated. Glicksmann evaluated the movingboundary problem of 3D precipitate growth in relation to the static-boundary case [22], and found that for small supersaturations the difference is negligible. A similar analysis has been done by Aaron and coworkers in the context of diffusional phase transformations [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a spherical cavity and isotropic diffusion (D gb /D V = 1) without boundaries (λ/a → ∞), the problem has been treated analytically [22]. For a constant diffusivity we can start from the diffusion equation in spherical coordinates;…”
Section: Appendix 1 Ideal Solutions To 3d 2d and 1d Diffusion Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…34,35 Here, we will only present the key relationships used in computational simulations and models. From irreversible thermodynamics, it can be shown that the self-diffusion constant D* is related to the velocity self-correlations of individual particles according to…”
Section: Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%